vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of LendingClub Corp (LC) and VIAVI SOLUTIONS INC. (VIAV). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
VIAVI SOLUTIONS INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($406.8M vs $252.3M, roughly 1.6× LendingClub Corp). LendingClub Corp runs the higher net margin — 20.5% vs 1.6%, a 18.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, VIAVI SOLUTIONS INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (42.8% vs 15.9%). Over the past eight quarters, VIAVI SOLUTIONS INC.'s revenue compounded faster (27.1% CAGR vs 16.1%).
LendingClub Corporation is an American financial services company headquartered in San Francisco, California. It was the first peer-to-peer lender to register its offerings as securities with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), and to offer loan trading on a secondary market. At its height, LendingClub was the world's largest peer-to-peer lending platform. The company reported that $15.98 billion in loans had been originated through its platform up to December 31, 2015.
Viavi Solutions Inc., formerly part of JDS Uniphase Corporation (JDSU), is an American network test, measurement and assurance technology company based in Chandler, Arizona. The company manufactures testing and monitoring equipment for networks. It also develops optical technology used for a range of applications including material quality control, currency anti-counterfeiting and 3D motion sensing, including Microsoft's Kinect video game controller.
LC vs VIAV — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $252.3M | $406.8M |
| Net Profit | $51.6M | $6.4M |
| Gross Margin | — | 57.5% |
| Operating Margin | — | 6.1% |
| Net Margin | 20.5% | 1.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 15.9% | 42.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | 341.0% | -76.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.44 | $0.03 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $252.3M | $406.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $266.5M | $369.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $266.2M | $299.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $248.4M | $290.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $217.7M | $284.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $217.2M | $270.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $201.9M | $238.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $187.2M | $252.0M |
| Q1 26 | $51.6M | $6.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-48.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $44.3M | $-21.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $38.2M | $8.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.7M | $19.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $9.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.5M | $-1.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.9M | $-21.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | 57.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 57.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 56.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 56.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 56.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 59.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 57.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 57.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 6.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 18.8% | 3.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.5% | 2.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.7% | 5.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.2% | 3.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.1% | 8.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.9% | 4.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.4% | -2.3% |
| Q1 26 | 20.5% | 1.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -13.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.6% | -7.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.4% | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.4% | 6.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.2% | -0.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.0% | -8.6% |
| Q1 26 | $0.44 | $0.03 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.36 | $-0.21 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.37 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.33 | $0.03 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.10 | $0.09 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.08 | $0.04 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.13 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.13 | $-0.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $500.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $1.1B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.5B | $846.5M |
| Total Assets | $11.9B | $2.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.28× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $500.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $767.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $545.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $425.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $396.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $509.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $493.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $491.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $0 | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $0 | $640.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $0 | $396.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $0 | $396.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $0 | $639.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $637.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $636.0M |
| Q1 26 | $1.5B | $846.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $834.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $723.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $780.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $728.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $682.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | $702.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $681.6M |
| Q1 26 | $11.9B | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | $11.6B | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.1B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.8B | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.5B | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.6B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.0B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.6B | $1.7B |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.28× | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.00× | 1.46× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.00× | 0.88× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.00× | 0.51× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.00× | 0.54× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.00× | 0.94× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.91× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.93× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
