vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of loanDepot, Inc. (LDI) and TIC Solutions, Inc. (TIC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
TIC Solutions, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($508.3M vs $310.3M, roughly 1.6× loanDepot, Inc.). loanDepot, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -7.2% vs -9.3%, a 2.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. TIC Solutions, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($37.1M vs $-648.0M).
LoanDepot, sometimes stylized as loanDepot, is an Irvine, California-based nonbank holding company which sells mortgage and non-mortgage lending products.
LDI vs TIC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $310.3M | $508.3M |
| Net Profit | $-22.5M | $-47.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | 35.2% |
| Operating Margin | -10.3% | -3.8% |
| Net Margin | -7.2% | -9.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 20.5% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 32.4% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | — | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $310.3M | $508.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $323.3M | $473.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $282.5M | $313.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $273.6M | $234.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $257.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $314.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $265.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $222.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-22.5M | $-47.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.9M | $-13.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-13.4M | $-233.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-21.9M | $-25.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-33.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-32.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-34.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 35.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 32.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 23.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 18.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -10.3% | -3.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -3.2% | -1.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -11.4% | 5.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -16.8% | -4.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -32.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -29.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -38.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | -7.2% | -9.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.5% | -2.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -4.7% | -0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -8.0% | -11.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -12.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -12.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -15.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.08 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.01 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.18 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.19 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $337.2M | $439.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.1B | $1.6B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $386.0M | $2.2B |
| Total Assets | $6.9B | $4.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 5.44× | 0.74× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $337.2M | $439.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $459.2M | $164.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $408.6M | $130.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $371.5M | $155.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $421.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $483.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $533.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $603.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1B | $751.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0B | $752.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.3B | — |
| Q4 25 | $386.0M | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $433.3M | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $439.1M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $469.3M | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $506.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $592.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $578.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $637.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | $6.9B | $4.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.2B | $4.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.2B | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.4B | $2.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.3B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.4B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.9B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.2B | — |
| Q4 25 | 5.44× | 0.74× | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.83× | 0.83× | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.70× | 0.64× | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.30× | 0.67× | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.00× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.31× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.41× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.63× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-638.7M | $49.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-648.0M | $37.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -208.9% | 7.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.0% | 2.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-734.6M | $61.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-638.7M | $49.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $43.4M | $19.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $67.6M | $-6.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-179.9M | $32.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $47.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-349.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-278.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-278.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-648.0M | $37.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $38.7M | $10.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $61.4M | $-14.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-186.7M | $28.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $40.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-356.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-285.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-283.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | -208.9% | 7.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.0% | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.7% | -4.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -68.2% | 12.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -113.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -107.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -127.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | 3.0% | 2.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.5% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.2% | 2.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.5% | 1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -255.05× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LDI
Segment breakdown not available.
TIC
| Consulting Engineering Segment | $300.1M | 59% |
| Geospatial Segment | $131.3M | 26% |
| Fixed Unit Price Contracts | $54.3M | 11% |
| Other | $22.6M | 4% |
