vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of LEAR CORP (LEA) and Molson Coors Beverage Company (TAP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
LEAR CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($6.0B vs $2.7B, roughly 2.2× Molson Coors Beverage Company). Molson Coors Beverage Company runs the higher net margin — 5.5% vs 1.4%, a 4.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, LEAR CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (4.8% vs 2.0%). LEAR CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($281.1M vs $-212.9M). Over the past eight quarters, LEAR CORP's revenue compounded faster (-0.1% CAGR vs -15.8%).
Lear Corporation is an American company that manufactures automotive seating and electrical systems. In 2019, it ranked #147 and in 2018, it ranked #148 on the Fortune 500 list.
Molson Coors Beverage Company is a Canadian-American multinational drink and brewing company headquartered in Chicago, Illinois and Montreal, Quebec.
LEA vs TAP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $6.0B | $2.7B |
| Net Profit | $82.7M | $150.1M |
| Gross Margin | 5.7% | 33.0% |
| Operating Margin | 2.6% | — |
| Net Margin | 1.4% | 5.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 4.8% | 2.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -6.1% | 25.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.58 | $0.80 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $2.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.0B | $3.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.7B | $3.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.0B | $3.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.6B | $2.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.7B | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.6B | $3.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.0B | $3.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | $150.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $82.7M | $238.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $108.2M | $-2.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $165.2M | $428.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $80.7M | $121.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $88.1M | $287.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $135.8M | $199.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $173.1M | $427.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | 33.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.7% | 31.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.4% | 33.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.3% | 34.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.5% | 31.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.8% | 32.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.3% | 33.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.5% | 34.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.6% | 10.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.4% | -98.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.1% | 15.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.3% | 6.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.7% | 12.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.9% | 12.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.3% | 15.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 5.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.4% | 7.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.9% | -84.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.7% | 11.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.5% | 4.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.5% | 8.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.4% | 5.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.9% | 11.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.80 | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.58 | $1.32 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.02 | $-14.79 | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.06 | $2.13 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.49 | $0.59 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.64 | $1.39 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.41 | $0.96 | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.02 | $2.03 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.0B | $382.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.7B | $3.8B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $5.0B | $10.3B |
| Total Assets | $14.8B | $22.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.54× | 0.38× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $382.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.0B | $896.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0B | $950.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $887.9M | $613.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $779.9M | $412.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $969.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $763.9M | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $950.3M | $1.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | $3.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.7B | $6.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.8B | $6.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.8B | $6.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.7B | $6.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.7B | $6.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.8B | $6.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7B | $7.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | $10.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.0B | $10.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.1B | $10.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.1B | $13.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.7B | $13.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.5B | $13.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.8B | $13.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.8B | $13.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | $22.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $14.8B | $22.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.2B | $22.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.3B | $26.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.6B | $25.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.0B | $26.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.8B | $26.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.7B | $27.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.38× | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.54× | 0.61× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.54× | 0.61× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.54× | 0.47× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.59× | 0.47× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.61× | 0.47× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.58× | 0.47× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.57× | 0.53× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $475.9M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $281.1M | $-212.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 4.7% | -7.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.3% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 5.75× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $527.2M | $1.2B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $475.9M | $540.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $444.4M | $616.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $296.2M | $718.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-127.7M | $-90.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $680.8M | $494.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $182.7M | $521.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $291.2M | $869.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-212.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $281.1M | $357.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $307.0M | $483.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $170.8M | $555.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-231.7M | $-328.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $488.7M | $383.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $50.5M | $350.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $170.4M | $691.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | -7.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.7% | 11.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.4% | 13.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.8% | 14.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.2% | -12.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.6% | 11.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.9% | 9.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.8% | 18.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.3% | 5.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.4% | 3.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.1% | 4.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.9% | 8.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.4% | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.4% | 4.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.0% | 4.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.75× | 2.27× | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.11× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.79× | 1.68× | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.58× | -0.75× | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.73× | 1.72× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.35× | 2.61× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.68× | 2.04× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LEA
| Other | $3.5B | 59% |
| Seating Segment | $1.9B | 32% |
| E Systems Segment | $520.6M | 9% |
TAP
Segment breakdown not available.
