vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of LEAR CORP (LEA) and WESCO INTERNATIONAL INC (WCC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
WESCO INTERNATIONAL INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($6.1B vs $6.0B, roughly 1.0× LEAR CORP). WESCO INTERNATIONAL INC runs the higher net margin — 2.5% vs 1.4%, a 1.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, WESCO INTERNATIONAL INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (13.8% vs 4.8%). LEAR CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($281.1M vs $213.4M). Over the past eight quarters, WESCO INTERNATIONAL INC's revenue compounded faster (5.3% CAGR vs -0.1%).
Lear Corporation is an American company that manufactures automotive seating and electrical systems. In 2019, it ranked #147 and in 2018, it ranked #148 on the Fortune 500 list.
Wesco International, Inc. is a publicly traded American holding company for Wesco Distribution, an electrical distribution and services company based in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
LEA vs WCC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $6.0B | $6.1B |
| Net Profit | $82.7M | $153.8M |
| Gross Margin | 5.7% | 21.2% |
| Operating Margin | 2.6% | 4.8% |
| Net Margin | 1.4% | 2.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 4.8% | 13.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | -6.1% | 47.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.58 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $6.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.0B | $6.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.7B | $6.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.0B | $5.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.6B | $5.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.7B | $5.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.6B | $5.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.0B | $5.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | $153.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $82.7M | $159.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $108.2M | $187.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $165.2M | $174.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $80.7M | $118.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $88.1M | $165.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $135.8M | $204.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $173.1M | $232.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | 21.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.7% | 21.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.4% | 21.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.3% | 21.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.5% | 21.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.8% | 21.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.3% | 22.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.5% | 21.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | 4.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.6% | 5.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.4% | 5.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.1% | 5.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.3% | 4.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.7% | 5.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.9% | 6.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.3% | 5.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | 2.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.4% | 2.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.9% | 3.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.7% | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.5% | 2.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.5% | 3.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.4% | 3.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.9% | 4.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.58 | $3.33 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.02 | $3.79 | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.06 | $3.83 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.49 | $2.10 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.64 | $3.01 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.41 | $3.81 | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.02 | $4.28 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.0B | $696.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.7B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $5.0B | $5.1B |
| Total Assets | $14.8B | $17.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.54× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $696.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $887.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $779.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $763.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $950.3M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.7B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.8B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.8B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.7B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.7B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.8B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $5.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.0B | $5.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.1B | $4.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.1B | $4.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.7B | $5.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.5B | $5.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.8B | $5.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.8B | $4.9B |
| Q1 26 | — | $17.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | $14.8B | $16.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.2B | $16.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.3B | $16.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.6B | $15.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.0B | $15.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.8B | $15.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.7B | $15.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.54× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.54× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.54× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.59× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.61× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.58× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.57× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $475.9M | $221.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $281.1M | $213.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 4.7% | 3.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.3% | 0.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 5.75× | 1.44× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $527.2M | $231.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $221.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $475.9M | $71.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $444.4M | $-82.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $296.2M | $107.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-127.7M | $28.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $680.8M | $276.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $182.7M | $302.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $291.2M | $-223.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | $213.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $281.1M | $27.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $307.0M | $-95.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $170.8M | $86.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-231.7M | $7.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $488.7M | $252.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $50.5M | $272.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $170.4M | $-244.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | 3.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.7% | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.4% | -1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.8% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.2% | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.6% | 4.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.9% | 5.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.8% | -4.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.3% | 0.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.4% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.1% | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.9% | 0.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.4% | 0.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.4% | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.0% | 0.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.44× | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.75× | 0.45× | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.11× | -0.44× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.79× | 0.62× | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.58× | 0.24× | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.73× | 1.67× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.35× | 1.48× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.68× | -0.96× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LEA
| Other | $3.5B | 59% |
| Seating Segment | $1.9B | 32% |
| E Systems Segment | $520.6M | 9% |
WCC
| CSS | $2.5B | 41% |
| EES | $2.2B | 37% |
| UBS | $1.4B | 22% |
