vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of LEAR CORP (LEA) and Block, Inc. (XYZ). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Block, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($6.3B vs $5.8B, roughly 1.1× LEAR CORP). LEAR CORP runs the higher net margin — 3.0% vs 1.9%, a 1.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, LEAR CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (4.7% vs 3.6%). Block, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($579.8M vs $-26.5M). Over the past eight quarters, Block, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (2.4% CAGR vs -1.6%).
Lear Corporation is an American company that manufactures automotive seating and electrical systems. In 2019, it ranked #147 and in 2018, it ranked #148 on the Fortune 500 list.
Block, Inc. is an American technology company and a financial services provider for consumers and merchants. Founded in 2009 by Jack Dorsey, it is the U.S. market leader in point-of-sale systems. As of 2024, Block serves 57 million users and 4 million sellers, processing $241 billion in payments annually.
LEA vs XYZ — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $5.8B | $6.3B |
| Net Profit | $172.3M | $115.8M |
| Gross Margin | 7.7% | 45.9% |
| Operating Margin | — | 7.8% |
| Net Margin | 3.0% | 1.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 4.7% | 3.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 113.5% | -94.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $3.34 | $0.19 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $5.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.0B | $6.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.7B | $6.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.0B | $6.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.6B | $5.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.7B | $6.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.6B | $6.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.0B | $6.2B |
| Q1 26 | $172.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $82.7M | $115.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $108.2M | $461.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $165.2M | $538.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $80.7M | $189.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $88.1M | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $135.8M | $283.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $173.1M | $195.3M |
| Q1 26 | 7.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.7% | 45.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.4% | 43.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.3% | 41.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.5% | 39.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.8% | 38.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.3% | 37.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.5% | 36.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.6% | 7.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.4% | 6.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.1% | 8.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.3% | 5.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.7% | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.9% | 5.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.3% | 5.0% |
| Q1 26 | 3.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.4% | 1.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.9% | 7.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.7% | 8.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.5% | 3.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.5% | 32.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.4% | 4.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.9% | 3.2% |
| Q1 26 | $3.34 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.58 | $0.19 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.02 | $0.74 | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.06 | $0.87 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.49 | $0.30 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.64 | $3.06 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.41 | $0.45 | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.02 | $0.31 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $881.9M | $6.6B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.7B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $5.3B | $22.2B |
| Total Assets | $15.5B | $39.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.52× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $881.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.0B | $6.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0B | $8.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $887.9M | $6.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $779.9M | $7.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $8.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $763.9M | $8.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $950.3M | $7.8B |
| Q1 26 | $2.7B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.7B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.8B | $7.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.8B | $5.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.7B | $5.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.7B | $6.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.8B | $6.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7B | $6.1B |
| Q1 26 | $5.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.0B | $22.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.1B | $22.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.1B | $22.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.7B | $21.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.5B | $21.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.8B | $19.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.8B | $19.3B |
| Q1 26 | $15.5B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $14.8B | $39.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.2B | $39.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.3B | $36.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.6B | $36.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.0B | $36.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.8B | $36.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.7B | $37.5B |
| Q1 26 | 0.52× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.54× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.54× | 0.32× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.54× | 0.23× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.59× | 0.24× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.61× | 0.29× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.58× | 0.31× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.57× | 0.32× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $98.1M | $621.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-26.5M | $579.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -0.5% | 9.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.1% | 0.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.57× | 5.36× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $732.4M | $2.4B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $98.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $475.9M | $621.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $444.4M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $296.2M | $374.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-127.7M | $133.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $680.8M | $13.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $182.7M | $684.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $291.2M | $519.4M |
| Q1 26 | $-26.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $281.1M | $579.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $307.0M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $170.8M | $343.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-231.7M | $101.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $488.7M | $-13.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $50.5M | $628.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $170.4M | $481.0M |
| Q1 26 | -0.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.7% | 9.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.4% | 22.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.8% | 5.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.2% | 1.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.6% | -0.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.9% | 10.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.8% | 7.8% |
| Q1 26 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.3% | 0.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.4% | 0.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.1% | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.9% | 0.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.4% | 0.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.4% | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.0% | 0.6% |
| Q1 26 | 0.57× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.75× | 5.36× | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.11× | 3.14× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.79× | 0.70× | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.58× | 0.70× | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.73× | 0.01× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.35× | 2.41× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.68× | 2.66× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LEA
| Seating | $4.4B | 76% |
| E-Systems | $1.4B | 24% |
XYZ
| US | $5.7B | 91% |
| Non Us | $560.9M | 9% |