vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Legacy Housing Corp (LEGH) and NORTHERN TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL CORP (NTIC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Legacy Housing Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($25.5M vs $23.3M, roughly 1.1× NORTHERN TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL CORP). Legacy Housing Corp runs the higher net margin — 32.2% vs 1.0%, a 31.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, NORTHERN TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.2% vs -30.6%). Legacy Housing Corp produced more free cash flow last quarter ($15.7M vs $-479.7K). Over the past eight quarters, NORTHERN TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL CORP's revenue compounded faster (5.8% CAGR vs -9.1%).
Legacy Housing Corp is a prominent U.S.-based manufacturer of affordable manufactured homes, tiny homes, and accessory dwelling units. It mainly caters to low- and middle-income consumers across North America, providing customizable residential solutions, supporting construction materials, and after-sales services for individual and community development clients.
Maxar Technologies Inc., was an American space technology company, specializing in geospatial intelligence, Earth observation, and on-orbit satellite servicing, satellite products, and related services. DigitalGlobe and MDA Holdings Company merged to become Maxar Technologies on October 5, 2017.
LEGH vs NTIC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $25.5M | $23.3M |
| Net Profit | $8.2M | $237.8K |
| Gross Margin | 26.4% | 36.0% |
| Operating Margin | 40.4% | 4.0% |
| Net Margin | 32.2% | 1.0% |
| Revenue YoY | -30.6% | 9.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -43.5% | -57.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.38 | $0.03 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $25.5M | $23.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $28.8M | $22.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $38.4M | $21.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $24.3M | $19.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $36.7M | $21.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $30.2M | $23.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $31.7M | $20.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $30.8M | $20.8M |
| Q4 25 | $8.2M | $237.8K | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.6M | $-1.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.7M | $121.8K | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.3M | $434.3K | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.5M | $561.1K | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.8M | $1.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.2M | $976.6K | ||
| Q1 24 | $15.1M | $1.7M |
| Q4 25 | 26.4% | 36.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.2% | 37.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 32.4% | 38.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 29.2% | 35.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 27.3% | 38.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 29.2% | 43.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.9% | 38.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 33.6% | 40.0% |
| Q4 25 | 40.4% | 4.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 33.7% | 4.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 43.8% | 4.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 47.7% | -1.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 42.3% | 5.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 50.8% | 11.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 50.6% | 7.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 54.3% | 10.6% |
| Q4 25 | 32.2% | 1.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 30.0% | -4.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 38.3% | 0.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 42.3% | 2.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 39.5% | 2.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 52.4% | 7.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 51.1% | 4.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 49.1% | 8.2% |
| Q4 25 | $0.38 | $0.03 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.35 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.60 | $0.01 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.41 | $0.04 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.59 | $0.06 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.64 | $0.19 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.65 | $0.10 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.60 | $0.17 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $8.5M | $6.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $528.6M | $72.4M |
| Total Assets | $580.3M | $104.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $8.5M | $6.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.6M | $7.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.6M | $6.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.4M | $5.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1M | $5.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $570.0K | $5.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $60.0K | $5.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $621.0K | $4.8M |
| Q4 25 | $528.6M | $72.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $521.6M | $72.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $512.8M | $72.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $503.7M | $69.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $494.0M | $70.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $479.3M | $71.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $463.2M | $68.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $450.4M | $68.4M |
| Q4 25 | $580.3M | $104.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $557.9M | $102.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $552.0M | $99.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $544.6M | $93.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $534.2M | $94.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $521.4M | $94.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $514.9M | $89.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $510.0M | $87.3M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $19.0M | $341.9K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $15.7M | $-479.7K |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 61.6% | -2.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 13.1% | 3.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.32× | 1.44× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $28.2M | $-1.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $19.0M | $341.9K | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.2M | $-1.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.1M | $609.7K | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.9M | $803.7K | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.9M | $2.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.5M | $1.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $15.7M | $-479.7K | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.1M | $-1.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.7M | $-171.2K | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.6M | $293.1K | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.0M | $1.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7M | $869.4K | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | 61.6% | -2.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.8% | -6.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.6% | -0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.0% | 1.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.4% | 5.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.4% | 4.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 32.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | 13.1% | 3.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.1% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.2% | 3.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.2% | 2.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.1% | 5.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.5% | 5.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.32× | 1.44× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.83× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.41× | 5.01× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.48× | 1.85× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.54× | 4.27× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.88× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.21× | 1.99× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.71× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LEGH
| Commercial Sales | $8.6M | 34% |
| Retail Store Sales | $6.0M | 24% |
| Inventory Finance Sales | $5.0M | 20% |
| Direct Sales | $4.4M | 17% |
| Other | $1.5M | 6% |
NTIC
| Inside The USA To Unaffiliated Customers | $7.5M | 32% |
| Natur Tec | $6.0M | 26% |
| Acobal | $3.6M | 15% |
| Other | $2.7M | 12% |
| BR | $2.1M | 9% |
| Zerust OY | $1.4M | 6% |
