vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Legacy Housing Corp (LEGH) and Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Legacy Housing Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($25.5M vs $15.8M, roughly 1.6× Spire Global, Inc.). Legacy Housing Corp runs the higher net margin — 32.2% vs -176.6%, a 208.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Spire Global, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-26.9% vs -30.6%). Legacy Housing Corp produced more free cash flow last quarter ($15.7M vs $-16.2M). Over the past eight quarters, Legacy Housing Corp's revenue compounded faster (-9.1% CAGR vs -32.6%).
Legacy Housing Corp is a prominent U.S.-based manufacturer of affordable manufactured homes, tiny homes, and accessory dwelling units. It mainly caters to low- and middle-income consumers across North America, providing customizable residential solutions, supporting construction materials, and after-sales services for individual and community development clients.
Spire Global, Inc. is a space-to-cloud data and analytics company that specializes in the tracking of global data sets powered by a large constellation of nanosatellites, such as the tracking of maritime, aviation and weather patterns.
LEGH vs SPIR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $25.5M | $15.8M |
| Net Profit | $8.2M | $-28.0M |
| Gross Margin | 26.4% | 40.2% |
| Operating Margin | 40.4% | -164.1% |
| Net Margin | 32.2% | -176.6% |
| Revenue YoY | -30.6% | -26.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -43.5% | 42.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.38 | $-0.85 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $25.5M | $15.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $28.8M | $12.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $38.4M | $19.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $24.3M | $23.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $36.7M | $21.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $30.2M | $28.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $31.7M | $25.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $30.8M | $34.8M |
| Q4 25 | $8.2M | $-28.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.6M | $-19.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.7M | $119.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.3M | $-20.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.5M | $-48.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.8M | $-12.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.2M | $-16.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $15.1M | $-25.5M |
| Q4 25 | 26.4% | 40.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.2% | 36.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 32.4% | 48.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 29.2% | 36.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 27.3% | 32.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 29.2% | 44.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.9% | 43.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 33.6% | 26.5% |
| Q4 25 | 40.4% | -164.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 33.7% | -166.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 43.8% | -122.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 47.7% | -106.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 42.3% | -144.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 50.8% | -48.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 50.6% | -48.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 54.3% | -34.4% |
| Q4 25 | 32.2% | -176.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 30.0% | -155.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 38.3% | 623.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 42.3% | -86.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 39.5% | -225.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 52.4% | -43.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 51.1% | -65.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 49.1% | -73.3% |
| Q4 25 | $0.38 | $-0.85 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.35 | $-0.61 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.60 | $3.72 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.41 | $-0.77 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.59 | $-1.93 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.64 | $-0.50 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.65 | $-0.68 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.60 | $-1.17 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $8.5M | $81.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $528.6M | $112.9M |
| Total Assets | $580.3M | $211.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $8.5M | $81.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.6M | $96.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.6M | $117.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.4M | $35.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1M | $19.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $570.0K | $36.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $60.0K | $45.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $621.0K | $63.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $103.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $103.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $4.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $123.1M |
| Q4 25 | $528.6M | $112.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $521.6M | $133.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $512.8M | $149.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $503.7M | $3.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $494.0M | $-11.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $479.3M | $30.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $463.2M | $40.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $450.4M | $52.5M |
| Q4 25 | $580.3M | $211.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $557.9M | $224.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $552.0M | $239.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $544.6M | $208.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $534.2M | $193.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $521.4M | $224.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $514.9M | $230.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $510.0M | $252.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 27.92× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.16× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.12× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.35× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $19.0M | $-4.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $15.7M | $-16.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 61.6% | -102.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 13.1% | 75.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.32× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $28.2M | $-92.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $19.0M | $-4.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.2M | $-12.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.1M | $-35.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.9M | $-8.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.9M | $-19.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.8M | $14.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.5M | $-4.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.8M | $-8.8M |
| Q4 25 | $15.7M | $-16.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.1M | $-20.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.7M | $-38.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.6M | $-17.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.0M | $-24.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.1M | $5.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7M | $-9.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.9M | $-15.9M |
| Q4 25 | 61.6% | -102.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.8% | -161.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.6% | -201.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.0% | -72.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.4% | -112.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.2% | 17.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.4% | -39.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 32.2% | -45.7% |
| Q4 25 | 13.1% | 75.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.1% | 66.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.2% | 18.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.2% | 37.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.1% | 23.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.6% | 31.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.5% | 21.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.8% | 20.3% |
| Q4 25 | 2.32× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.83× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.41× | -0.29× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.48× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.54× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.88× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.21× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.71× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LEGH
| Commercial Sales | $8.6M | 34% |
| Retail Store Sales | $6.0M | 24% |
| Inventory Finance Sales | $5.0M | 20% |
| Direct Sales | $4.4M | 17% |
| Other | $1.5M | 6% |
SPIR
Segment breakdown not available.