vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of LGL GROUP INC (LGL) and Vertiv Holdings Co (VRT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Vertiv Holdings Co is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.6B vs $803.0K, roughly 3299.5× LGL GROUP INC). Vertiv Holdings Co runs the higher net margin — 14.7% vs -3.4%, a 18.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Vertiv Holdings Co posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (30.1% vs 23.0%). Over the past eight quarters, LGL GROUP INC's revenue compounded faster (43.1% CAGR vs 16.5%).

LGL Group Inc is a global electronic components manufacturer that designs, produces and markets high-performance frequency control products, radio frequency components and integrated circuit solutions. It primarily serves aerospace, defense, telecommunications, industrial and medical technology end markets, supplying specialized parts with strict reliability requirements.

Vertiv is an American multinational provider of critical infrastructure and services for data centers, communication networks, and commercial and industrial environments.

LGL vs VRT — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
VRT
VRT
3299.5× larger
VRT
$2.6B
$803.0K
LGL
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
VRT
VRT
+7.2% gap
VRT
30.1%
23.0%
LGL
Higher net margin
VRT
VRT
18.1% more per $
VRT
14.7%
-3.4%
LGL
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
LGL
LGL
Annualised
LGL
43.1%
16.5%
VRT

Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q1 2026

Metric
LGL
LGL
VRT
VRT
Revenue
$803.0K
$2.6B
Net Profit
$-27.0K
$390.1M
Gross Margin
37.7%
Operating Margin
14.8%
Net Margin
-3.4%
14.7%
Revenue YoY
23.0%
30.1%
Net Profit YoY
-113.4%
137.1%
EPS (diluted)
$-0.02
$0.99

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
LGL
LGL
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
$2.6B
Q4 25
$803.0K
$2.9B
Q3 25
$661.0K
$2.7B
Q2 25
$491.0K
$2.6B
Q1 25
$498.0K
$2.0B
Q4 24
$653.0K
$2.3B
Q3 24
$650.0K
$2.1B
Q2 24
$531.0K
$2.0B
Net Profit
LGL
LGL
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
$390.1M
Q4 25
$-27.0K
$445.6M
Q3 25
$772.0K
$398.5M
Q2 25
$-51.0K
$324.2M
Q1 25
$-6.0K
$164.5M
Q4 24
$202.0K
$147.0M
Q3 24
$72.0K
$176.6M
Q2 24
$137.0K
$178.1M
Gross Margin
LGL
LGL
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
37.7%
Q4 25
38.9%
Q3 25
37.8%
Q2 25
34.0%
Q1 25
33.7%
Q4 24
37.1%
Q3 24
36.5%
Q2 24
38.0%
Operating Margin
LGL
LGL
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
Q4 25
14.8%
20.1%
Q3 25
18.2%
19.3%
Q2 25
-6.3%
16.8%
Q1 25
8.2%
14.3%
Q4 24
37.5%
19.5%
Q3 24
21.2%
17.9%
Q2 24
44.6%
17.2%
Net Margin
LGL
LGL
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
14.7%
Q4 25
-3.4%
15.5%
Q3 25
116.8%
14.9%
Q2 25
-10.4%
12.3%
Q1 25
-1.2%
8.1%
Q4 24
30.9%
6.3%
Q3 24
11.1%
8.5%
Q2 24
25.8%
9.1%
EPS (diluted)
LGL
LGL
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
$0.99
Q4 25
$-0.02
$1.14
Q3 25
$0.14
$1.02
Q2 25
$-0.01
$0.83
Q1 25
$0.00
$0.42
Q4 24
$0.05
$0.38
Q3 24
$0.01
$0.46
Q2 24
$0.02
$0.46

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
LGL
LGL
VRT
VRT
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$41.5M
$2.5B
Total DebtLower is stronger
$0
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$43.5M
$4.2B
Total Assets
$46.8M
$13.4B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.00×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
LGL
LGL
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
$2.5B
Q4 25
$41.5M
$1.7B
Q3 25
$41.6M
$1.4B
Q2 25
$41.8M
$1.6B
Q1 25
$41.9M
$1.5B
Q4 24
$41.6M
$1.2B
Q3 24
$41.6M
$908.7M
Q2 24
$41.1M
$579.7M
Total Debt
LGL
LGL
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
$0
Q4 25
$2.9B
Q3 25
$2.9B
Q2 25
$2.9B
Q1 25
$2.9B
Q4 24
$2.9B
Q3 24
$2.9B
Q2 24
$2.9B
Stockholders' Equity
LGL
LGL
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
$4.2B
Q4 25
$43.5M
$3.9B
Q3 25
$39.8M
$3.5B
Q2 25
$39.1M
$3.1B
Q1 25
$39.2M
$2.7B
Q4 24
$39.2M
$2.4B
Q3 24
$39.0M
$1.8B
Q2 24
$38.9M
$1.5B
Total Assets
LGL
LGL
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
$13.4B
Q4 25
$46.8M
$12.2B
Q3 25
$43.3M
$10.8B
Q2 25
$43.0M
$10.4B
Q1 25
$43.3M
$9.5B
Q4 24
$43.1M
$9.1B
Q3 24
$42.5M
$8.9B
Q2 24
$42.2M
$8.1B
Debt / Equity
LGL
LGL
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
0.00×
Q4 25
0.74×
Q3 25
0.83×
Q2 25
0.93×
Q1 25
1.10×
Q4 24
1.20×
Q3 24
1.62×
Q2 24
1.91×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
LGL
LGL
VRT
VRT
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$-355.0K
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$652.8M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
24.6%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
4.2%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$2.3B

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
LGL
LGL
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
Q4 25
$-355.0K
$978.9M
Q3 25
$275.0K
$508.7M
Q2 25
$-190.0K
$322.9M
Q1 25
$340.0K
$303.3M
Q4 24
$-17.0K
$425.2M
Q3 24
$528.0K
$378.2M
Q2 24
$203.0K
$378.4M
Free Cash Flow
LGL
LGL
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
$652.8M
Q4 25
$885.6M
Q3 25
$463.5M
Q2 25
$277.9M
Q1 25
$266.8M
Q4 24
$364.5M
Q3 24
$341.8M
Q2 24
$344.3M
FCF Margin
LGL
LGL
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
24.6%
Q4 25
30.8%
Q3 25
17.3%
Q2 25
10.5%
Q1 25
13.1%
Q4 24
15.5%
Q3 24
16.5%
Q2 24
17.6%
Capex Intensity
LGL
LGL
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
4.2%
Q4 25
3.2%
Q3 25
1.7%
Q2 25
1.7%
Q1 25
1.8%
Q4 24
2.6%
Q3 24
1.8%
Q2 24
1.7%
Cash Conversion
LGL
LGL
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
Q4 25
2.20×
Q3 25
0.36×
1.28×
Q2 25
1.00×
Q1 25
1.84×
Q4 24
-0.08×
2.89×
Q3 24
7.33×
2.14×
Q2 24
1.48×
2.12×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Related Comparisons