vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of MICROVISION, INC. (MVIS) and Vertiv Holdings Co (VRT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Vertiv Holdings Co is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.6B vs $223.0K, roughly 11881.2× MICROVISION, INC.). Vertiv Holdings Co runs the higher net margin — 14.7% vs -16930.9%, a 16945.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Vertiv Holdings Co posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (30.1% vs -86.5%). Vertiv Holdings Co produced more free cash flow last quarter ($652.8M vs $-15.6M). Over the past eight quarters, Vertiv Holdings Co's revenue compounded faster (16.5% CAGR vs -51.7%).
MicroVision Inc. is a technology company specializing in advanced LiDAR sensors, miniature display solutions, and perception software. Its core products serve automotive ADAS, augmented reality devices, consumer electronics, and industrial automation markets, delivering high-precision, low-power sensing technologies for next-generation smart applications.
Vertiv is an American multinational provider of critical infrastructure and services for data centers, communication networks, and commercial and industrial environments.
MVIS vs VRT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q1 2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $223.0K | $2.6B |
| Net Profit | $-37.8M | $390.1M |
| Gross Margin | -7220.6% | 37.7% |
| Operating Margin | -18570.0% | — |
| Net Margin | -16930.9% | 14.7% |
| Revenue YoY | -86.5% | 30.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -21.2% | 137.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.12 | $0.99 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $223.0K | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $241.0K | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $155.0K | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $589.0K | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6M | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $190.0K | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9M | $2.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | $390.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-37.8M | $445.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-14.2M | $398.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-14.2M | $324.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-28.8M | $164.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-31.2M | $147.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-15.5M | $176.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-23.9M | $178.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | 37.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | -7220.6% | 38.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -297.1% | 37.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -361.9% | 34.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.6% | 33.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -149.5% | 37.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -206.8% | 36.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.2% | 38.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -18570.0% | 20.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -5278.4% | 19.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -9455.5% | 16.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2383.7% | 14.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1119.5% | 19.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -8266.3% | 17.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1296.4% | 17.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | 14.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | -16930.9% | 15.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -5899.2% | 14.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -9180.0% | 12.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -4886.1% | 8.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1888.2% | 6.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -8166.8% | 8.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1259.5% | 9.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.99 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.12 | $1.14 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.05 | $1.02 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.06 | $0.83 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.12 | $0.42 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.15 | $0.38 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.07 | $0.46 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.11 | $0.46 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $74.9M | $2.5B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $19.2M | $0 |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $55.5M | $4.2B |
| Total Assets | $103.1M | $13.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.35× | 0.00× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | $74.9M | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $99.5M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $91.4M | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $69.0M | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $74.7M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $43.2M | $908.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $56.6M | $579.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | $0 | ||
| Q4 25 | $19.2M | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $29.0M | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.3M | $2.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $30.1M | $2.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $33.0M | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.9B |
| Q1 26 | — | $4.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $55.5M | $3.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $90.7M | $3.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $77.1M | $3.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $53.2M | $2.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $48.8M | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $65.9M | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $78.7M | $1.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | $13.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $103.1M | $12.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $150.8M | $10.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $140.6M | $10.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $116.7M | $9.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $121.2M | $9.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $88.3M | $8.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $103.4M | $8.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.35× | 0.74× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.32× | 0.83× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.42× | 0.93× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.57× | 1.10× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.68× | 1.20× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.62× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.91× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-15.4M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-15.6M | $652.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -7017.5% | 24.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 109.4% | 4.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-59.4M | $2.3B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-15.4M | $978.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-16.5M | $508.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-12.7M | $322.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-14.1M | $303.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-15.1M | $425.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-14.1M | $378.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-18.6M | $378.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $652.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-15.6M | $885.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-16.6M | $463.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-12.9M | $277.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-14.2M | $266.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-15.2M | $364.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-14.1M | $341.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-18.8M | $344.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | 24.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | -7017.5% | 30.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -6894.6% | 17.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -8346.5% | 10.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2410.4% | 13.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -918.7% | 15.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -7421.1% | 16.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -989.5% | 17.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 4.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 109.4% | 3.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 53.1% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 134.2% | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.8% | 1.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.2% | 2.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.7% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.7% | 1.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 2.20× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.28× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.00× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.84× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.89× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.14× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.12× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
