vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Legence Corp. (LGN) and SM Energy Co (SM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Legence Corp. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($708.0M vs $704.9M, roughly 1.0× SM Energy Co). On growth, Legence Corp. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (26.2% vs -17.3%).
Legence Corp is a leading sustainable building and decarbonization solution provider. It delivers energy efficiency optimization, building automation design, renewable energy integration, and low-carbon retrofit services for commercial, industrial, and institutional clients, with core operations across North America to help customers cut costs and reduce carbon footprints.
SM Energy Company is a company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration. It is organized in Delaware and headquartered in Denver, Colorado.
LGN vs SM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $708.0M | $704.9M |
| Net Profit | $-576.0K | — |
| Gross Margin | 20.9% | — |
| Operating Margin | 5.3% | 25.9% |
| Net Margin | -0.1% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 26.2% | -17.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 46.8% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.02 | $0.94 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $704.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $708.0M | $811.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $792.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $844.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $852.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $560.8M | $643.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $634.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $559.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-576.0K | $155.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $201.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $182.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.1M | $240.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $210.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $131.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 25.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.3% | 30.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 37.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 32.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 33.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.8% | 51.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 44.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 31.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.1% | 19.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 25.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 21.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.2% | 37.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 33.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 23.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.94 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.02 | $1.35 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.76 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.59 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.63 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.09 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.82 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.13 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $176.0M | $368.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $812.6M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $387.9M | $4.8B |
| Total Assets | $2.6B | $9.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 2.10× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $368.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $176.0M | $162.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $101.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $54.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $487.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $506.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $812.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $4.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $387.9M | $4.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $4.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.7B |
| Q4 25 | — | $9.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6B | $9.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $9.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $8.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $8.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $8.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $6.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $6.4B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.10× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $162.1M | $451.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $137.4M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 19.4% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.5% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $451.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $162.1M | $505.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $571.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $483.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $578.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $452.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $476.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $276.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $137.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.26× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.83× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.65× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.88× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.27× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.10× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LGN
| Installation And Fabrication | $408.7M | 58% |
| Engineering And Design | $110.9M | 16% |
| Program And Project Management | $101.2M | 14% |
| Maintenance And Service | $87.1M | 12% |
SM
Segment breakdown not available.
