vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Linde plc (LIN) and Texas Instruments (TXN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Linde plc is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($8.8B vs $4.8B, roughly 1.8× Texas Instruments). On growth, Texas Instruments posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (18.6% vs 8.2%). Texas Instruments produced more free cash flow last quarter ($1.4B vs $898.0K). Over the past eight quarters, Texas Instruments's revenue compounded faster (12.4% CAGR vs 3.1%).
Linde is a global multinational chemical company and the world's largest industrial gas supplier by market share and revenue. Founded by German scientist and engineer Carl von Linde in 1879 in Wiesbaden, Germany, the company is now headquartered in Woking, United Kingdom, and registered in Ireland as Linde plc. Linde plc was formed in 2018 through the merger of Linde AG and Praxair, which was founded in 1907 in the United States as Linde Air Products Company.
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TI) is an American multinational semiconductor company headquartered in Dallas, Texas. It is one of the top 10 semiconductor companies worldwide based on sales volume. The company's focus is on developing analog chips and embedded processors, which account for more than 80% of its revenue. TI also produces digital light processing (DLP) technology and education technology products including calculators, microcontrollers, and multi-core processors.
LIN vs TXN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $8.8B | $4.8B |
| Net Profit | — | $1.5B |
| Gross Margin | 48.5% | 58.0% |
| Operating Margin | 27.8% | 37.5% |
| Net Margin | — | 32.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 8.2% | 18.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 31.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $3.98 | $1.68 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $8.8B | $4.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $8.8B | $4.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.6B | $4.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.5B | $4.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.1B | $4.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.3B | $4.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.4B | $4.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.3B | $3.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $1.1B |
| Q1 26 | 48.5% | 58.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 55.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 57.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 57.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 56.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 57.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 59.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 57.8% |
| Q1 26 | 27.8% | 37.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 23.0% | 33.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 27.5% | 35.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 27.7% | 35.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.9% | 32.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 27.4% | 34.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.0% | 37.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 26.4% | 32.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 32.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 17.5% | 26.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.4% | 28.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.8% | 29.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.6% | 29.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.8% | 30.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.5% | 32.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.1% | 29.5% |
| Q1 26 | $3.98 | $1.68 | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.28 | $1.28 | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.09 | $1.48 | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.73 | $1.41 | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.51 | $1.28 | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.61 | $1.31 | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.22 | $1.47 | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.44 | $1.22 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $4.0B | $5.1B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $24.7B | $14.1B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $40.1B | $16.8B |
| Total Assets | $86.3B | $34.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.62× | 0.84× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $4.0B | $5.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.1B | $4.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.5B | $5.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.8B | $5.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.3B | $5.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.8B | $7.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.2B | $8.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.6B | $9.7B |
| Q1 26 | $24.7B | $14.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $20.7B | $14.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.6B | $14.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $19.7B | $14.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.6B | $12.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.3B | $13.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.5B | $13.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.9B | $13.9B |
| Q1 26 | $40.1B | $16.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $38.2B | $16.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $38.6B | $16.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $38.5B | $16.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $38.0B | $16.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $38.1B | $16.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $39.2B | $17.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $38.2B | $17.2B |
| Q1 26 | $86.3B | $34.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $86.8B | $34.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $86.0B | $35.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $86.1B | $34.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $82.7B | $33.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $80.1B | $35.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $82.5B | $35.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $80.2B | $35.0B |
| Q1 26 | 0.62× | 0.84× | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.54× | 0.86× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.48× | 0.84× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.51× | 0.86× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.46× | 0.78× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.40× | 0.80× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.45× | 0.80× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.44× | 0.81× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $898.0K | $1.4B |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 0.0% | 29.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 14.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $4.2B | $4.3B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.0B | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.9B | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.2B | $849.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.8B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.7B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | $1.6B |
| Q1 26 | $898.0K | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $993.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $954.0M | $555.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $891.0M | $-274.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $806.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | $416.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $796.0M | $507.0M |
| Q1 26 | 0.0% | 29.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 17.9% | 30.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.4% | 20.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.2% | 12.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.0% | -6.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.8% | 20.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.9% | 10.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.6% | 13.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | 14.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 16.6% | 20.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.8% | 25.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.8% | 29.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.7% | 27.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.1% | 29.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.8% | 31.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.7% | 27.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.98× | 1.94× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.53× | 1.61× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.25× | 1.44× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.29× | 0.72× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.63× | 1.66× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.76× | 1.27× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.16× | 1.39× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
