vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Lineage, Inc. (LINE) and Snap-on (SNA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Lineage, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.4B vs $1.2B, roughly 1.1× Snap-on). Snap-on runs the higher net margin — 21.3% vs -7.3%, a 28.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Lineage, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (3.1% vs 2.7%). Snap-on produced more free cash flow last quarter ($254.6M vs $35.0M).
Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings (NCLH) is a holding company that is based in the United States and domiciled in Bermuda. It operates three cruise lines as wholly owned subsidiaries: Norwegian Cruise Line, Oceania Cruises, and Regent Seven Seas Cruises. With its subsidiaries combined, it is the third-largest cruise operator in the world. It is a publicly traded company listed on the New York Stock Exchange.
Snap-on Incorporated is an American designer, manufacturer, and marketer of high-end tools and equipment for professional use in the transportation industry, including the automotive, heavy duty, equipment, marine, aviation, and railroad industries. Headquartered in Kenosha, Wisconsin, since 1930, Snap-on also distributes lower-end tools under the brand name Blue-Point. Their primary competitors include Matco, Mac Tools, and Cornwell Tools.
LINE vs SNA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.4B | $1.2B |
| Net Profit | $-100.0M | $260.7M |
| Gross Margin | 32.3% | — |
| Operating Margin | 2.5% | 27.8% |
| Net Margin | -7.3% | 21.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 3.1% | 2.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 79.4% | 1.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.44 | $4.94 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.3B | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | — | $260.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-100.0M | $265.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-6.0M | $250.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $0 | $240.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-71.0M | $258.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-485.0M | $251.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-68.0M | $271.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-40.0M | $263.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 32.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 32.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 32.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 33.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 27.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.5% | 29.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.7% | 28.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.3% | 27.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.6% | 27.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -38.6% | 28.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.5% | 29.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.6% | 28.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 21.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -7.3% | 22.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.4% | 21.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 21.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -5.3% | 21.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -36.3% | 22.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.1% | 23.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -3.0% | 22.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | $4.94 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.44 | $5.02 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.03 | $4.72 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.01 | $4.51 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.52 | $4.83 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.44 | $4.70 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.46 | $5.07 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.28 | $4.91 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $8.4B | — |
| Total Assets | $19.2B | — |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $173.0M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $409.0M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $73.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.1B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.4B | $5.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.6B | $5.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.6B | $5.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.6B | $5.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.0B | $5.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.9B | $5.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.6B | $5.1B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.2B | $8.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $19.4B | $8.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.8B | $8.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $18.7B | $7.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.3B | $8.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.8B | $7.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $7.7B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.21× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.21× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.22× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $230.0M | $268.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $35.0M | $254.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 2.5% | 20.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 14.2% | 1.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.03× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $1.0B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $268.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $230.0M | $277.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $258.0M | $237.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $139.0M | $298.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $293.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $186.0M | $274.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $155.0M | $301.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $105.0M | $348.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $254.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $35.0M | $258.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $95.0M | $217.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-12.0M | $275.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $275.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $33.0M | $253.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-31.0M | $277.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-42.0M | $326.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | 20.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.5% | 21.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.0% | 18.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.9% | 24.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 23.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.5% | 22.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.3% | 23.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -3.2% | 27.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.2% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.1% | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.7% | 2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.5% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.9% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.1% | 1.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.03× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.05× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.95× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.24× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.14× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.09× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.11× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.32× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LINE
| Warehousing Operations | $883.0M | 64% |
| Other | $308.0M | 22% |
| Warehouse Lease | $60.0M | 4% |
| Food Sales | $52.0M | 4% |
| E Commerce And Other | $46.0M | 3% |
| Railcar Lease | $23.0M | 2% |
| Service Other | $5.0M | 0% |
SNA
Segment breakdown not available.