vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of INTERLINK ELECTRONICS INC (LINK) and Rithm Property Trust Inc. (RPT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Rithm Property Trust Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.4M vs $2.9M, roughly 1.2× INTERLINK ELECTRONICS INC). Rithm Property Trust Inc. runs the higher net margin — 95.4% vs -20.1%, a 115.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, INTERLINK ELECTRONICS INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-4.5% vs -39.7%). Over the past eight quarters, INTERLINK ELECTRONICS INC's revenue compounded faster (-4.4% CAGR vs -43.2%).
Interlink Electronics, Inc. is a technology company that specializes in manufacturing sensors that are used in electronic portable devices, such as smartphones, GPS systems, and in industrial computers and systems controls.
Rithm Capital Corp. (Rithm) is an American investment management company headquartered in New York that focuses on real estate and alternative investments.
LINK vs RPT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.9M | $3.4M |
| Net Profit | $-574.0K | $3.2M |
| Gross Margin | 31.7% | — |
| Operating Margin | -25.7% | 99.6% |
| Net Margin | -20.1% | 95.4% |
| Revenue YoY | -4.5% | -39.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -39.0% | 11.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.01 | $-0.26 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.9M | $3.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.0M | $4.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.4M | $4.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.7M | $249.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-574.0K | $3.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-336.0K | $-273.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $100.0K | $1.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-805.0K | $-3.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-413.0K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-523.0K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-307.0K | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-741.0K | — |
| Q4 25 | 31.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 41.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 45.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 35.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 39.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 41.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 45.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 40.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | -25.7% | 99.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -10.6% | -6.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.9% | 45.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -31.9% | -1416.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -17.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -17.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -10.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -24.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | -20.1% | 95.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -11.4% | -6.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.9% | 45.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -30.2% | -1363.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -13.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -19.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -10.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -23.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | $-0.01 | $-0.26 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.03 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.00 | $0.01 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.09 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.01 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.04 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.04 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.09 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $2.7M | $79.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $9.2M | $291.6M |
| Total Assets | $11.7M | $1.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $2.7M | $79.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.0M | $81.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.3M | $98.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6M | $97.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | $9.2M | $291.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.6M | $291.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.0M | $294.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.8M | $296.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | $11.7M | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.1M | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.5M | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.5M | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $14.5M | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-356.0K | $-8.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-375.0K | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -13.1% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.7% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -2.56× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-168.0K | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-356.0K | $-8.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $653.0K | $-5.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-138.0K | $-25.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-271.0K | $-1.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-223.0K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-68.0K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-298.0K | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $222.0K | — |
| Q4 25 | $-375.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $650.0K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-143.0K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-300.0K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-293.0K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-155.0K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-300.0K | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $204.0K | — |
| Q4 25 | -13.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -4.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -11.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -9.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -5.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -10.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -2.56× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.38× | -0.01× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LINK
| Transferred At Point In Time | $2.7M | 94% |
| Other | $185.0K | 6% |
RPT
Segment breakdown not available.
