vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Limbach Holdings, Inc. (LMB) and Sprout Social, Inc. (SPT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Limbach Holdings, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($186.9M vs $120.9M, roughly 1.5× Sprout Social, Inc.). On growth, Limbach Holdings, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (30.1% vs 12.9%). Limbach Holdings, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($27.9M vs $9.9M). Over the past eight quarters, Limbach Holdings, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (25.3% CAGR vs 11.8%).
Limbach Flugmotoren is a Chinese-owned company based in Germany that produces aircraft engines.
Sprout Social, Inc. is a technology company that runs a social media management platform. A public company headquartered in Chicago, it was founded in 2010 by Justyn Howard, Aaron Rankin, Gil Lara, and Peter Soung.
LMB vs SPT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $186.9M | $120.9M |
| Net Profit | $12.3M | — |
| Gross Margin | 25.7% | 77.6% |
| Operating Margin | 9.4% | -9.0% |
| Net Margin | 6.6% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 30.1% | 12.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | 25.0% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.01 | $-0.18 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $186.9M | $120.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $184.6M | $115.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $142.2M | $111.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $133.1M | $109.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $143.7M | $107.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $133.9M | $102.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $122.2M | $99.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $119.0M | $96.8M |
| Q4 25 | $12.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.8M | $-9.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.8M | $-12.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.2M | $-11.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.5M | $-17.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.0M | $-16.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.6M | $-13.6M |
| Q4 25 | 25.7% | 77.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.2% | 77.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.0% | 77.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 27.6% | 77.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 30.3% | 78.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.0% | 77.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 27.4% | 77.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 26.1% | 76.8% |
| Q4 25 | 9.4% | -9.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.2% | -7.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.5% | -11.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.9% | -10.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.1% | -12.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.1% | -16.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.7% | -16.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.5% | -13.7% |
| Q4 25 | 6.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.8% | -8.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.5% | -10.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.7% | -10.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.6% | -16.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.9% | -17.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.4% | -14.0% |
| Q4 25 | $1.01 | $-0.18 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.73 | $-0.16 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.64 | $-0.21 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.85 | $-0.19 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.81 | $-0.25 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.62 | $-0.30 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.50 | $-0.30 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.64 | $-0.24 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $11.3M | $95.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $30.5M | $40.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $195.7M | $203.4M |
| Total Assets | $381.1M | $523.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.16× | 0.20× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $11.3M | $95.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.8M | $90.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $38.9M | $101.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $38.1M | $100.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $44.9M | $86.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $51.2M | $82.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $59.5M | $80.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $48.2M | $69.2M |
| Q4 25 | $30.5M | $40.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $56.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $28.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $23.6M | $25.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $20.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $19.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | $195.7M | $203.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $181.6M | $194.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $170.5M | $184.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $161.1M | $175.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $153.5M | $166.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $142.2M | $158.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $133.0M | $152.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $125.5M | $147.3M |
| Q4 25 | $381.1M | $523.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $409.1M | $481.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $343.0M | $422.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $336.4M | $424.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $352.1M | $428.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $324.4M | $388.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $303.9M | $393.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $289.2M | $389.9M |
| Q4 25 | 0.16× | 0.20× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.31× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.17× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.15× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.15× | 0.15× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.14× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.15× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.15× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $28.1M | $10.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $27.9M | $9.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 14.9% | 8.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.1% | 0.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.29× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $41.9M | $39.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $28.1M | $10.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.3M | $9.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.0M | $5.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.2M | $18.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.3M | $4.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.9M | $9.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.5M | $2.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.9M | $11.2M |
| Q4 25 | $27.9M | $9.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.8M | $8.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2M | $4.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.0K | $16.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $18.0M | $3.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.6M | $8.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.2M | $1.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-6.5M | $10.1M |
| Q4 25 | 14.9% | 8.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.0% | 7.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.8% | 3.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.0% | 15.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.5% | 3.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.4% | 8.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.8% | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -5.5% | 10.4% |
| Q4 25 | 0.1% | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.3% | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.6% | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.7% | 1.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.9% | 0.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.3% | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.7% | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.1% | 1.1% |
| Q4 25 | 2.29× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.52× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.26× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.22× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.96× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.66× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.77× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.52× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LMB
| Owner Direct Relationships Segment | $145.0M | 78% |
| General Contractor Construction Manager Relationships Segment | $41.9M | 22% |
SPT
Segment breakdown not available.