vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) and Molson Coors Beverage Company (TAP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Cheniere Energy, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($5.4B vs $3.1B, roughly 1.7× Molson Coors Beverage Company). Cheniere Energy, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 42.8% vs 7.6%, a 35.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Cheniere Energy, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (20.3% vs -3.6%). Cheniere Energy, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($1.3B vs $357.8M). Over the past eight quarters, Cheniere Energy, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (14.3% CAGR vs 1.2%).
Cheniere Energy, Inc. is an American liquefied natural gas (LNG) company headquartered in Houston, Texas.
Molson Coors Beverage Company is a Canadian-American multinational drink and brewing company headquartered in Chicago, Illinois and Montreal, Quebec.
LNG vs TAP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $5.4B | $3.1B |
| Net Profit | $2.3B | $238.3M |
| Gross Margin | — | 31.0% |
| Operating Margin | 70.8% | 10.4% |
| Net Margin | 42.8% | 7.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 20.3% | -3.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 135.6% | -17.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $10.51 | $1.32 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $5.4B | $3.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.3B | $3.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.5B | $3.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.3B | $2.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.5B | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.7B | $3.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.1B | $3.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.1B | $3.0B |
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | $238.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0B | $-2.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | $428.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $353.0M | $121.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $977.0M | $287.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $893.0M | $199.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $880.0M | $427.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $502.0M | $207.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | 31.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 33.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 34.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 31.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 32.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 33.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 34.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 31.6% |
| Q4 25 | 70.8% | 10.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 42.3% | -98.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 56.1% | 15.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.2% | 6.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 38.9% | 12.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 44.7% | 12.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 50.5% | 15.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 28.0% | 10.3% |
| Q4 25 | 42.8% | 7.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.4% | -84.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 36.1% | 11.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.7% | 4.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.9% | 8.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.2% | 5.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 28.0% | 11.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 12.2% | 6.8% |
| Q4 25 | $10.51 | $1.32 | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.75 | $-14.79 | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.30 | $2.13 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.57 | $0.59 | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.30 | $1.39 | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.93 | $0.96 | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.84 | $2.03 | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.13 | $0.97 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.1B | $896.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $22.5B | $6.3B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $7.9B | $10.2B |
| Total Assets | $47.9B | $22.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 2.84× | 0.61× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $896.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $950.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | $613.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.5B | $412.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.6B | $969.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.7B | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.4B | $458.4M |
| Q4 25 | $22.5B | $6.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.0B | $6.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.0B | $6.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $22.5B | $6.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.6B | $6.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.5B | $6.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $22.6B | $7.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $21.4B | $6.2B |
| Q4 25 | $7.9B | $10.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.7B | $10.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.7B | $13.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.6B | $13.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.7B | $13.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.1B | $13.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.5B | $13.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.3B | $13.1B |
| Q4 25 | $47.9B | $22.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $45.1B | $22.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $44.6B | $26.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $43.5B | $25.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $43.9B | $26.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $43.1B | $26.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $42.3B | $27.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $42.9B | $26.1B |
| Q4 25 | 2.84× | 0.61× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.25× | 0.61× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.28× | 0.47× | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.03× | 0.47× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.96× | 0.47× | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.42× | 0.47× | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.06× | 0.53× | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.04× | 0.47× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $2.1B | $540.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $1.3B | $357.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 24.4% | 11.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 13.8% | 5.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.89× | 2.27× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $2.5B | $1.1B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | $540.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $616.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $831.0M | $718.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $-90.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $494.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $521.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $869.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.2B | $25.4M |
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $357.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $738.0M | $483.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-193.0M | $555.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $605.0M | $-328.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $383.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $875.0M | $350.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $613.0M | $691.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $596.0M | $-189.3M |
| Q4 25 | 24.4% | 11.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.2% | 13.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -4.3% | 14.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.4% | -12.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.0% | 11.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.8% | 9.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.5% | 18.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 14.5% | -6.2% |
| Q4 25 | 13.8% | 5.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.0% | 3.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.7% | 4.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.8% | 8.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.7% | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.0% | 4.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.0% | 4.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 15.8% | 7.0% |
| Q4 25 | 0.89× | 2.27× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.36× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.51× | 1.68× | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.48× | -0.75× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.68× | 1.72× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.56× | 2.61× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.27× | 2.04× | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.48× | 0.12× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LNG
| Liquefied Natural Gas | $5.3B | 99% |
| Other | $103.0M | 2% |
| Regasification Service | $34.0M | 1% |
TAP
Segment breakdown not available.
