vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of LINDSAY CORP (LNN) and PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust (PMT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
LINDSAY CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($150.7M vs $93.6M, roughly 1.6× PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust). PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust runs the higher net margin — 56.0% vs 11.0%, a 45.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, LINDSAY CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-6.1% vs -13.3%). Over the past eight quarters, PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust's revenue compounded faster (12.3% CAGR vs 1.3%).
Lindsay Corporation, formerly known as Lindsay Manufacturing Co., is a manufacturer of Zimmatic brand center pivot irrigation systems, based in Omaha, Nebraska, United States. It also manufactures farm and construction machinery, as well as road and railroad infrastructure equipment. At August 31, 2008, the company had 1,239 employees.
PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust is a U.S.-headquartered real estate investment trust specializing in residential mortgage assets. It invests in performing and non-performing mortgage loans, mortgage-backed securities, and credit risk transfer instruments, operating across investment management and mortgage servicing segments in the U.S. housing market.
LNN vs PMT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $150.7M | $93.6M |
| Net Profit | $16.5M | $52.4M |
| Gross Margin | 33.3% | — |
| Operating Margin | 13.0% | 38.6% |
| Net Margin | 11.0% | 56.0% |
| Revenue YoY | -6.1% | -13.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -3.7% | 12.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.54 | $0.49 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $150.7M | $93.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $149.0M | $99.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $165.7M | $70.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $183.8M | $44.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $160.5M | $107.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $149.4M | $80.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $133.7M | $71.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $146.8M | $74.2M |
| Q4 25 | $16.5M | $52.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.8M | $58.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $19.5M | $7.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $26.6M | $9.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.2M | $46.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.7M | $41.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $20.4M | $25.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $18.1M | $47.6M |
| Q4 25 | 33.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 30.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 32.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 34.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 31.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 34.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 33.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 13.0% | 38.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.6% | 47.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.4% | 24.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.5% | -14.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.0% | 51.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.0% | 32.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.9% | 40.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 15.1% | 43.6% |
| Q4 25 | 11.0% | 56.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.3% | 58.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.8% | 10.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.5% | 21.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.7% | 43.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.5% | 51.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.2% | 35.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 12.3% | 64.2% |
| Q4 25 | $1.54 | $0.49 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.99 | $0.55 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.78 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.44 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.57 | $0.45 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.16 | $0.36 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.85 | $0.17 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.64 | $0.39 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $199.6M | $190.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $115.2M | $1.1B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $518.2M | $1.9B |
| Total Assets | $828.4M | $21.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.22× | 0.58× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $199.6M | $190.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $250.6M | $181.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $210.8M | $108.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $186.7M | $204.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $194.1M | $103.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $190.9M | $102.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $152.7M | $336.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $150.6M | $343.3M |
| Q4 25 | $115.2M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $115.3M | $299.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $115.3M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $115.4M | $968.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $115.4M | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $115.5M | $5.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $115.5M | $5.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $115.6M | $5.1B |
| Q4 25 | $518.2M | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $532.9M | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $528.8M | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $516.4M | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $488.5M | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $480.9M | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $480.0M | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $483.0M | $2.0B |
| Q4 25 | $828.4M | $21.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $840.8M | $18.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $840.9M | $16.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $814.2M | $14.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $771.0M | $14.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $760.2M | $13.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $758.1M | $12.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $765.3M | $12.3B |
| Q4 25 | 0.22× | 0.58× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.22× | 0.16× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.22× | 0.65× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.22× | 0.51× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.24× | 0.52× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.24× | 2.70× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.24× | 2.76× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.24× | 2.60× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-597.0K | $-7.2B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-15.1M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -10.0% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 9.6% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.04× | -137.76× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $62.9M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-597.0K | $-7.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $64.0M | $-1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $35.0M | $-2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.3M | $-594.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.6M | $-2.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $53.1M | $-983.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.5M | $243.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-9.7M | $-342.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-15.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $49.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $12.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-21.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | -10.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 33.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 31.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -14.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | 9.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | -0.04× | -137.76× | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.92× | -22.26× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.79× | -267.53× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.46× | -61.39× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.26× | -58.08× | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.17× | -23.76× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.50× | 9.59× | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.54× | -7.19× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LNN
| Transferred At Point In Time | $133.2M | 88% |
| Infrastructure | $13.4M | 9% |
| Transferred Over Time | $8.0M | 5% |
PMT
| Other | $55.0M | 59% |
| Interest Rate Sensitive Strategies | $31.4M | 34% |
| Correspondent Production | $7.2M | 8% |
