vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Loar Holdings Inc. (LOAR) and PicoCELA Inc. (PCLA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PicoCELA Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($252.6M vs $131.8M, roughly 1.9× Loar Holdings Inc.). Loar Holdings Inc. runs the higher net margin — 9.5% vs -125.2%, a 134.7% gap on every dollar of revenue.
PicoCELA Inc. is a global technology company specializing in low-power, high-reliability wireless connectivity solutions, including Wi-Fi HaLow modules and edge network infrastructure. It caters to industrial IoT, smart city, retail, and smart home segments, with a primary operational footprint across Asia, North America, and European markets.
LOAR vs PCLA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $131.8M | $252.6M |
| Net Profit | $12.5M | $-316.2M |
| Gross Margin | 52.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | 18.0% | -114.8% |
| Net Margin | 9.5% | -125.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 19.3% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 239.5% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.13 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $131.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $126.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $123.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $114.7M | $252.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $110.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $103.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $97.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $91.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $12.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $27.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.3M | $-316.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | 52.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 52.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 53.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 52.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 48.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 51.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 49.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 48.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 18.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.8% | -114.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 23.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 9.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.4% | -125.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | $0.13 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.29 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.17 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.16 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-11023.48 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.09 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.09 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $11023.54 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $84.8M | $456.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $715.7M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.2B | $354.8M |
| Total Assets | $2.0B | $1.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.61× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $84.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $99.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $103.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $80.5M | $456.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $54.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $55.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $73.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $28.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $715.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $279.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $277.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $277.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $277.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $602.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $250.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $534.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $354.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $769.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $758.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $420.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1B | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.61× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.24× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.25× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.25× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.25× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.78× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.33× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.27× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $30.4M | $-245.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-256.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -101.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 4.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.43× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $30.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $29.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.4M | $-245.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $20.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-256.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -101.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.43× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.08× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.42× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.85× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.62× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.89× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.93× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.81× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LOAR
| Other | $76.8M | 58% |
| Commercial Aerospace | $21.2M | 16% |
| Business Jet And General Aviation | $17.6M | 13% |
| Defense | $16.2M | 12% |
PCLA
| Revenue from product | $179.1M | 71% |
| Revenue from SaaS, Maintenance and others | $42.4M | 17% |
| Revenue from product – related party | $31.0M | 12% |
