vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of El Pollo Loco Holdings, Inc. (LOCO) and Ranpak Holdings Corp. (PACK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
El Pollo Loco Holdings, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($123.5M vs $93.7M, roughly 1.3× Ranpak Holdings Corp.). On growth, El Pollo Loco Holdings, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (8.1% vs 2.3%). Over the past eight quarters, Ranpak Holdings Corp.'s revenue compounded faster (13.7% CAGR vs 3.1%).
El Pollo Loco, Inc., is a restaurant chain based in the United States, specializing in Mexican-style grilled chicken. Restaurant service consists of dine-in and take-out, with some locations offering drive-through options. The company is headquartered in Costa Mesa, California, and operates about 500 company-owned and franchised restaurants in the Southwestern United States.
Ranpak Holdings Corp. manufactures machines and paper products used in protective paper-based packing for shipping goods and merchandise for e-commerce and industry, along with automation solutions. The company is based in Concord, Ohio, and has production facilities and offices in Reno, Nevada; Kansas City, Missouri; the Netherlands; Czech Republic; Shanghai and Singapore. The paper packaging material can be used for multiple applications like wrapping, cushioning, void fill and cold chain p...
LOCO vs PACK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $123.5M | $93.7M |
| Net Profit | $6.5M | — |
| Gross Margin | — | 39.0% |
| Operating Margin | 8.3% | -1.0% |
| Net Margin | 5.3% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 8.1% | 2.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 9.9% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.22 | $-0.11 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $123.5M | $93.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $121.5M | $83.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $125.8M | $77.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $119.2M | $77.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $114.3M | $91.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $120.4M | $78.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $122.2M | $72.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $116.2M | $72.5M |
| Q4 25 | $6.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.4M | $-10.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.1M | $-7.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.5M | $-10.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.2M | $-8.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.6M | $5.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.9M | $-8.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 39.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 41.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 37.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 39.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 45.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 43.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 43.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 44.6% |
| Q4 25 | 8.3% | -1.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.4% | -6.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.0% | -12.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.5% | -10.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.9% | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.4% | -5.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.1% | -7.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.3% | -6.6% |
| Q4 25 | 5.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.1% | -12.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.6% | -9.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.6% | -14.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.1% | -10.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.2% | 7.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.1% | -11.2% |
| Q4 25 | $0.22 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.25 | $-0.12 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.24 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.19 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.21 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.21 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.25 | $0.07 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.19 | $-0.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $6.2M | $63.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $51.0M | $401.9M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $291.1M | $534.9M |
| Total Assets | $606.6M | $1.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.18× | 0.75× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $6.2M | $63.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.9M | $49.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.0M | $49.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.3M | $65.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5M | $76.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.9M | $69.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.5M | $65.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.1M | $55.1M |
| Q4 25 | $51.0M | $401.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $61.0M | $403.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $69.0M | $403.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $73.0M | $405.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $71.0M | $406.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $76.0M | $403.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $87.0M | $396.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $80.0M | $396.7M |
| Q4 25 | $291.1M | $534.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $282.9M | $537.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $274.2M | $539.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $265.7M | $544.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $260.7M | $548.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $255.2M | $564.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $248.6M | $566.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $256.3M | $560.0M |
| Q4 25 | $606.6M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $602.7M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $596.8M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $590.5M | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $592.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $590.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $593.8M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $598.0M | $1.1B |
| Q4 25 | 0.18× | 0.75× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.22× | 0.75× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.25× | 0.75× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.27× | 0.74× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.27× | 0.74× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.30× | 0.71× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.35× | 0.70× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.31× | 0.71× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $13.9M | $19.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $5.1M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 4.1% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 7.1% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.13× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $25.4M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $13.9M | $19.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.3M | $8.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.1M | $-3.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.7M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.6M | $6.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.0M | $10.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.0M | $19.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.2M | $5.2M |
| Q4 25 | $5.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | 4.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | 7.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.13× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.08× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.99× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.86× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.95× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.11× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.22× | 3.56× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.89× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LOCO
| Services | $102.4M | 83% |
| Franchise | $13.0M | 11% |
| Franchise Advertising Fee | $8.1M | 7% |
PACK
| Other | $47.9M | 51% |
| Europe And Asia Segment | $45.8M | 49% |
