vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of El Pollo Loco Holdings, Inc. (LOCO) and Piedmont Realty Trust, Inc. (PDM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Piedmont Realty Trust, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($143.3M vs $126.2M, roughly 1.1× El Pollo Loco Holdings, Inc.). El Pollo Loco Holdings, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 6.5% vs -31.4%, a 37.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, El Pollo Loco Holdings, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (5.9% vs 0.4%). Over the past eight quarters, El Pollo Loco Holdings, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (1.6% CAGR vs 0.0%).
El Pollo Loco, Inc., is a restaurant chain based in the United States, specializing in Mexican-style grilled chicken. Restaurant service consists of dine-in and take-out, with some locations offering drive-through options. The company is headquartered in Costa Mesa, California, and operates about 500 company-owned and franchised restaurants in the Southwestern United States.
Piedmont Realty Trust, Inc. is a publicly traded real estate investment trust (REIT) that owns, operates, and invests in high-quality office properties primarily located in high-growth metropolitan areas across the United States. It serves corporate tenants across multiple industry sectors including technology, professional services, and healthcare, and pursues stable long-term returns for stakeholders via strategic property management and portfolio optimization.
LOCO vs PDM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $126.2M | $143.3M |
| Net Profit | $8.2M | $-45.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 9.7% | — |
| Net Margin | 6.5% | -31.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 5.9% | 0.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 48.8% | -27.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.27 | $-0.10 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $126.2M | $143.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $123.5M | $142.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $121.5M | $139.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $125.8M | $140.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $119.2M | $142.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $114.3M | $143.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $120.4M | $139.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $122.2M | $143.3M |
| Q1 26 | $8.2M | $-45.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.5M | $-43.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.4M | $-13.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.1M | $-16.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.5M | $-10.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.0M | $-30.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.2M | $-11.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.6M | $-9.8M |
| Q1 26 | 9.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.1% | — |
| Q1 26 | 6.5% | -31.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.3% | -30.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.1% | -9.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.6% | -12.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.6% | -7.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.2% | -20.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.1% | -8.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.2% | -6.8% |
| Q1 26 | $0.27 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.22 | $-0.34 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.25 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.24 | $-0.14 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.19 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.21 | $-0.25 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.21 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.25 | $-0.08 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $3.9M | $2.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $302.5M | $1.5B |
| Total Assets | $609.1M | $4.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $3.9M | $2.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.2M | $731.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.9M | $3.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.0M | $3.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.3M | $2.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5M | $109.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.9M | $133.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.5M | $138.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $51.0M | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $61.0M | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $69.0M | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $73.0M | $2.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $71.0M | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $76.0M | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $87.0M | $2.2B |
| Q1 26 | $302.5M | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | $291.1M | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $282.9M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $274.2M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $265.7M | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $260.7M | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $255.2M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $248.6M | $1.7B |
| Q1 26 | $609.1M | $4.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | $606.6M | $4.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $602.7M | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $596.8M | $4.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $590.5M | $4.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $592.0M | $4.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $590.0M | $4.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $593.8M | $4.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.18× | 1.49× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.22× | 1.43× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.25× | 1.41× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.27× | 1.40× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.27× | 1.40× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.30× | 1.36× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.35× | 1.34× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
