vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of El Pollo Loco Holdings, Inc. (LOCO) and Tecnoglass Inc. (TGLS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Tecnoglass Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($245.3M vs $123.5M, roughly 2.0× El Pollo Loco Holdings, Inc.). Tecnoglass Inc. runs the higher net margin — 10.6% vs 5.3%, a 5.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, El Pollo Loco Holdings, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (8.1% vs 2.4%). Tecnoglass Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($11.4M vs $5.1M). Over the past eight quarters, Tecnoglass Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (12.8% CAGR vs 3.1%).
El Pollo Loco, Inc., is a restaurant chain based in the United States, specializing in Mexican-style grilled chicken. Restaurant service consists of dine-in and take-out, with some locations offering drive-through options. The company is headquartered in Costa Mesa, California, and operates about 500 company-owned and franchised restaurants in the Southwestern United States.
Tecnoglass Inc. is a leading manufacturer of high-performance architectural glass, aluminum windows, doors, and associated building components. It primarily caters to residential and commercial construction sectors across North America and Latin America, offering custom, energy-efficient solutions for new construction and renovation projects.
LOCO vs TGLS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $123.5M | $245.3M |
| Net Profit | $6.5M | $26.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | 40.0% |
| Operating Margin | 8.3% | 18.3% |
| Net Margin | 5.3% | 10.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 8.1% | 2.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 9.9% | -44.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.22 | $0.57 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $123.5M | $245.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $121.5M | $260.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $125.8M | $255.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $119.2M | $222.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $114.3M | $239.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $120.4M | $238.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $122.2M | $219.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $116.2M | $192.6M |
| Q4 25 | $6.5M | $26.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.4M | $47.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.1M | $44.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.5M | $42.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.0M | $47.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.2M | $49.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.6M | $35.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.9M | $29.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | 40.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 42.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 44.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 43.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 44.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 45.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 40.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 38.8% |
| Q4 25 | 8.3% | 18.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.4% | 25.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.0% | 24.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.5% | 26.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.9% | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.4% | 28.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.1% | 23.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.3% | 21.3% |
| Q4 25 | 5.3% | 10.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.1% | 18.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.6% | 17.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.6% | 19.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.2% | 19.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.1% | 20.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.2% | 15.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.1% | 15.4% |
| Q4 25 | $0.22 | $0.57 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.25 | $1.01 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.24 | $0.94 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.19 | $0.90 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.21 | $1.00 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.21 | $1.05 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.25 | $0.75 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.19 | $0.63 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $6.2M | $104.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $51.0M | $174.4M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $291.1M | $713.1M |
| Total Assets | $606.6M | $1.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.18× | 0.24× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $6.2M | $104.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.9M | $127.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.0M | $140.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.3M | $160.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5M | $137.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.9M | $124.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.5M | $129.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.1M | $138.8M |
| Q4 25 | $51.0M | $174.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $61.0M | $114.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $69.0M | $110.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $73.0M | $110.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $71.0M | $111.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $76.0M | $126.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $87.0M | $144.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $80.0M | $160.9M |
| Q4 25 | $291.1M | $713.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $282.9M | $764.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $274.2M | $736.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $265.7M | $685.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $260.7M | $631.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $255.2M | $613.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $248.6M | $574.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $256.3M | $573.6M |
| Q4 25 | $606.6M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $602.7M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $596.8M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $590.5M | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $592.0M | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $590.0M | $996.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $593.8M | $942.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $598.0M | $981.6M |
| Q4 25 | 0.18× | 0.24× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.22× | 0.15× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.25× | 0.15× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.27× | 0.16× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.27× | 0.18× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.30× | 0.21× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.35× | 0.25× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.31× | 0.28× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $13.9M | $31.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $5.1M | $11.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 4.1% | 4.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 7.1% | 8.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.13× | 1.19× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $25.4M | $34.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $13.9M | $31.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.3M | $40.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.1M | $17.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.7M | $46.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.6M | $61.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.0M | $41.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.0M | $34.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.2M | $33.4M |
| Q4 25 | $5.1M | $11.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.9M | $21.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.1M | $-14.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3M | $16.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1M | $35.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.1M | $17.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.4M | $14.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.0M | $23.6M |
| Q4 25 | 4.1% | 4.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.2% | 8.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.2% | -5.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.1% | 7.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.0% | 14.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.6% | 7.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.5% | 6.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.0% | 12.2% |
| Q4 25 | 7.1% | 8.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.4% | 7.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.0% | 12.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.8% | 13.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.9% | 10.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.2% | 9.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.3% | 9.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.6% | 5.1% |
| Q4 25 | 2.13× | 1.19× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.08× | 0.85× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.99× | 0.41× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.86× | 1.11× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.95× | 1.30× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.11× | 0.84× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.22× | 0.98× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.89× | 1.13× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LOCO
| Services | $102.4M | 83% |
| Franchise | $13.0M | 11% |
| Franchise Advertising Fee | $8.1M | 7% |
TGLS
| Product Sales | $164.2M | 67% |
| Fixed Price Contracts | $81.1M | 33% |
| Related Party | $692.0K | 0% |