vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of LOGITECH INTERNATIONAL S.A. (LOGI) and Roper Technologies (ROP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Roper Technologies is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.1B vs $1.4B, roughly 1.5× LOGITECH INTERNATIONAL S.A.). LOGITECH INTERNATIONAL S.A. runs the higher net margin — 17.7% vs 15.8%, a 1.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Roper Technologies posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.3% vs 6.1%). Roper Technologies produced more free cash flow last quarter ($507.0M vs $465.6M). Over the past eight quarters, LOGITECH INTERNATIONAL S.A.'s revenue compounded faster (18.5% CAGR vs 10.5%).
Logitech International S.A. is a Swiss multinational manufacturer of computer peripherals and software. Headquartered in Lausanne, Switzerland, the company has offices throughout Europe, Asia, Oceania, and the Americas. It is a component of the Swiss Market Index, and is listed on the Nasdaq.
Roper Technologies, Inc. is a holding company that owns companies in the technology sector.
LOGI vs ROP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.4B | $2.1B |
| Net Profit | $251.0M | $331.0M |
| Gross Margin | 43.2% | 69.4% |
| Operating Margin | 20.1% | 27.2% |
| Net Margin | 17.7% | 15.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.1% | 11.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 25.4% | 53.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.69 | $4.87 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $1.7B |
| Q1 26 | — | $331.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $251.0M | $428.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $170.7M | $398.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $146.0M | $378.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $144.1M | $331.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $200.1M | $462.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $145.5M | $367.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $141.8M | $337.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | 69.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | 43.2% | 69.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 43.4% | 69.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 41.7% | 69.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 43.1% | 68.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 42.9% | 68.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 43.6% | 69.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 42.8% | 69.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | 27.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 20.1% | 28.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.1% | 28.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.1% | 28.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.5% | 27.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.5% | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.4% | 28.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.1% | 28.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 15.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | 17.7% | 20.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.4% | 19.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.7% | 19.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.3% | 17.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.9% | 24.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.0% | 20.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.0% | 19.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | $4.87 | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.69 | $3.97 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.15 | $3.68 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.98 | $3.49 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.94 | $3.06 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.32 | $4.29 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.95 | $3.40 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.92 | $3.12 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.8B | $382.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $9.7B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.3B | $18.8B |
| Total Assets | $4.1B | $34.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.52× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $382.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | $297.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $320.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $242.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $372.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | $188.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $269.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $251.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | $9.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $9.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $7.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $18.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | $19.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1B | $20.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | $19.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1B | $19.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1B | $18.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $18.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.2B | $18.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | $34.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.1B | $34.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.7B | $34.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.7B | $33.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.5B | $31.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7B | $31.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.6B | $31.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.7B | $29.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.52× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.47× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.40× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $480.5M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $465.6M | $507.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 32.8% | 24.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.0% | 0.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.91× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $903.6M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $480.5M | $738.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $228.8M | $869.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $125.0M | $404.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $129.7M | $528.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $370.9M | $722.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $166.0M | $755.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $176.0M | $384.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | $507.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $465.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $212.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $108.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $116.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $356.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $151.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $161.4M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 24.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 32.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.3% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.91× | 1.72× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.34× | 2.18× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.86× | 1.07× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.90× | 1.60× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.85× | 1.56× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.14× | 2.05× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.24× | 1.14× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LOGI
| Retail Gaming | $482.7M | 34% |
| Retail Keyboards Desktops | $254.6M | 18% |
| Retail Pointing Devices | $241.2M | 17% |
| Retail Video Collaboration | $193.3M | 14% |
| Retail Tablet And Other Accessories | $93.6M | 7% |
| Retail Webcams | $82.3M | 6% |
| Retail Headsets | $45.9M | 3% |
| Other Retail Products | $28.0M | 2% |
ROP
Segment breakdown not available.
