vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of LOGITECH INTERNATIONAL S.A. (LOGI) and Tapestry, Inc. (TPR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Tapestry, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.5B vs $1.4B, roughly 1.8× LOGITECH INTERNATIONAL S.A.). Tapestry, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 22.4% vs 17.7%, a 4.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Tapestry, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (14.0% vs 6.1%). Tapestry, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($1.0B vs $465.6M). Over the past eight quarters, Tapestry, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (29.9% CAGR vs 18.5%).
Logitech International S.A. is a Swiss multinational manufacturer of computer peripherals and software. Headquartered in Lausanne, Switzerland, the company has offices throughout Europe, Asia, Oceania, and the Americas. It is a component of the Swiss Market Index, and is listed on the Nasdaq.
Tapestry, Inc. is a leading American multinational luxury fashion holding company. It owns three iconic lifestyle brands: Coach, Kate Spade New York, and Stuart Weitzman, offering premium handbags, apparel, footwear, accessories, and fragrances to global consumers via physical retail stores and e-commerce platforms.
LOGI vs TPR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.4B | $2.5B |
| Net Profit | $251.0M | $561.3M |
| Gross Margin | 43.2% | 75.5% |
| Operating Margin | 20.1% | 28.6% |
| Net Margin | 17.7% | 22.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.1% | 14.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 25.4% | 80.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.69 | $2.68 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.0B | $1.5B |
| Q4 25 | $251.0M | $561.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $170.7M | $274.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $146.0M | $-517.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $144.1M | $203.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $200.1M | $310.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $145.5M | $186.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $141.8M | $159.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $167.6M | $139.4M |
| Q4 25 | 43.2% | 75.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 43.4% | 76.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 41.7% | 76.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 43.1% | 76.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 42.9% | 74.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 43.6% | 75.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 42.8% | 74.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 43.2% | 74.7% |
| Q4 25 | 20.1% | 28.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.1% | 19.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.1% | -33.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.5% | 16.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.5% | 22.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.4% | 16.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.1% | 14.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 12.9% | 13.8% |
| Q4 25 | 17.7% | 22.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.4% | 16.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.7% | -30.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.3% | 12.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.9% | 14.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.0% | 12.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.0% | 10.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 16.6% | 9.4% |
| Q4 25 | $1.69 | $2.68 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.15 | $1.28 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.98 | $-2.30 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.94 | $0.95 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.32 | $1.38 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.95 | $0.79 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.92 | $0.67 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.07 | $0.60 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.8B | $1.1B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $2.4B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.3B | $551.2M |
| Total Assets | $4.1B | $6.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 4.32× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $743.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $7.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $7.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.5B | $7.4B |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $7.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $6.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $7.7B |
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | $551.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1B | $399.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | $857.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1B | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.2B | $2.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.2B | $2.8B |
| Q4 25 | $4.1B | $6.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.7B | $6.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.7B | $6.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.5B | $7.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7B | $7.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.6B | $13.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.7B | $13.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.6B | $13.7B |
| Q4 25 | — | 4.32× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 5.95× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.77× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.59× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.78× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.35× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.39× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.77× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $480.5M | $1.1B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $465.6M | $1.0B |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 32.8% | 41.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.0% | 1.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.91× | 1.93× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $903.6M | $1.6B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $480.5M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $228.8M | $112.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $125.0M | $446.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $129.7M | $144.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $370.9M | $506.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $166.0M | $119.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $176.0M | $256.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $239.1M | $97.8M |
| Q4 25 | $465.6M | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $212.3M | $80.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $108.8M | $411.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $116.9M | $113.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $356.6M | $475.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $151.5M | $93.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $161.4M | $209.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $228.8M | $78.8M |
| Q4 25 | 32.8% | 41.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.9% | 4.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.5% | 23.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.6% | 7.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.6% | 21.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.6% | 6.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.8% | 13.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 22.6% | 5.3% |
| Q4 25 | 1.0% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.4% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.3% | 2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.1% | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.3% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.3% | 2.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.0% | 1.3% |
| Q4 25 | 1.91× | 1.93× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.34× | 0.41× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.86× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.90× | 0.71× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.85× | 1.63× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.14× | 0.64× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.24× | 1.61× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.43× | 0.70× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LOGI
| Retail Gaming | $482.7M | 34% |
| Retail Keyboards Desktops | $254.6M | 18% |
| Retail Pointing Devices | $241.2M | 17% |
| Retail Video Collaboration | $193.3M | 14% |
| Retail Tablet And Other Accessories | $93.6M | 7% |
| Retail Webcams | $82.3M | 6% |
| Retail Headsets | $45.9M | 3% |
| Other Retail Products | $28.0M | 2% |
TPR
| Coach | $1.4B | 57% |
| Other | $787.0M | 31% |
| Kate Spade Company | $290.0M | 12% |