vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Grand Canyon Education, Inc. (LOPE) and MGIC INVESTMENT CORP (MTG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Grand Canyon Education, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($308.1M vs $297.1M, roughly 1.0× MGIC INVESTMENT CORP). MGIC INVESTMENT CORP runs the higher net margin — 55.6% vs 28.1%, a 27.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Grand Canyon Education, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (5.3% vs -3.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Grand Canyon Education, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (5.9% CAGR vs -1.4%).
Grand Canyon Education, Inc. (GCE) is an American for-profit corporation that provides services to universities, specializing in program development, online education, and operational support. Formerly affiliated with Grand Canyon University (GCU), a Christian university in Arizona, GCE became a separate publicly traded company in 2008.
MGIC Investment Corporation NYSE: MTG ("MGIC") is a provider of private mortgage insurance in the United States. The company is headquartered in Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
LOPE vs MTG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $308.1M | $297.1M |
| Net Profit | $86.7M | $165.3M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 35.1% | — |
| Net Margin | 28.1% | 55.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 5.3% | -3.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 5.9% | -10.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $3.13 | $0.76 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $297.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $308.1M | $298.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $261.1M | $304.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $247.5M | $304.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $289.3M | $306.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $292.6M | $301.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $238.3M | $306.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $227.5M | $305.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | $165.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $86.7M | $169.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.3M | $191.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $41.5M | $192.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $71.6M | $185.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $81.9M | $184.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $41.5M | $200.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $34.9M | $204.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 35.1% | 71.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.9% | 77.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.9% | 80.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 30.4% | 76.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 34.2% | 77.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.2% | 82.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.8% | 85.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 55.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | 28.1% | 56.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.2% | 62.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.8% | 63.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.8% | 60.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.0% | 61.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.4% | 65.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.3% | 66.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.76 | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.13 | $0.75 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.58 | $0.83 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.48 | $0.81 | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.52 | $0.75 | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.83 | $0.71 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.42 | $0.77 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.19 | $0.77 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $111.8M | $235.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $746.9M | $5.0B |
| Total Assets | $992.3M | $6.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $235.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $111.8M | $369.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $97.3M | $266.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $192.3M | $294.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $144.5M | $207.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $324.6M | $229.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $263.6M | $288.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $241.3M | $281.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | $5.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | $746.9M | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $758.0M | $5.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $778.0M | $5.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $780.7M | $5.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $783.9M | $5.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $764.1M | $5.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $759.2M | $5.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | $6.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $992.3M | $6.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0B | $6.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | $6.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $6.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.0B | $6.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $992.9M | $6.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $992.7M | $6.5B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $130.5M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $122.9M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 39.9% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.5% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.50× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $238.6M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $130.5M | $230.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-48.6M | $215.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $124.0M | $183.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $67.6M | $223.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $135.8M | $182.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-29.4M | $182.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $98.6M | $169.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $122.9M | $230.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-58.3M | $215.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $115.4M | $183.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $58.7M | $223.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $126.1M | $181.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-39.0M | $182.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $89.6M | $169.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 39.9% | 77.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -22.3% | 70.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 46.6% | 60.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.3% | 73.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 43.1% | 60.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -16.3% | 59.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 39.4% | 55.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.5% | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.7% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.5% | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.1% | 0.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.3% | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.0% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.9% | 0.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.50× | 1.36× | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.99× | 1.13× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.98× | 0.95× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.94× | 1.21× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.66× | 0.99× | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.71× | 0.91× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.83× | 0.83× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.