vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Logistic Properties of the Americas (LPA) and MID PENN BANCORP INC (MPB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
MID PENN BANCORP INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($62.0M vs $50.1M, roughly 1.2× Logistic Properties of the Americas). Logistic Properties of the Americas runs the higher net margin — 32.1% vs 31.4%, a 0.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. MID PENN BANCORP INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($71.8M vs $21.4M).
Logistic Properties of the Americas is a specialized industrial real estate firm that acquires, develops and manages logistics properties across North, Central and South America. Its portfolio includes distribution centers, warehouses and last-mile delivery facilities, serving e-commerce, retail, manufacturing and third-party logistics clients.
Commerce Bancorp was a Cherry Hill, New Jersey–based bank created in 1973. In 2007, it was purchased by Toronto-Dominion Bank, which merged Commerce into TD Banknorth, the latter of which was rebranded to TD Bank.
LPA vs MPB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $50.1M | $62.0M |
| Net Profit | $16.1M | $19.4M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 81.7% | 43.6% |
| Net Margin | 32.1% | 31.4% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 30.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 47.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.33 | $0.83 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $50.1M | $62.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $32.7M | $61.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.5M | $54.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.5M | $47.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $47.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.2M | $45.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $44.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.2M | $42.3M |
| Q4 25 | $16.1M | $19.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $18.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $4.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $13.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $13.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $12.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $11.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $12.1M |
| Q4 25 | 81.7% | 43.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 39.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 7.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 35.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 34.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 32.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 32.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 34.8% |
| Q4 25 | 32.1% | 31.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 29.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 8.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 28.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 27.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 27.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 26.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 28.7% |
| Q4 25 | $0.33 | $0.83 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.09 | $0.79 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.06 | $0.22 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.71 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.72 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.26 | $0.74 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.71 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.73 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $27.3M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $296.8M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $324.6M | $814.1M |
| Total Assets | $700.8M | $6.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.91× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $27.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | $296.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $324.6M | $814.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $796.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $775.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $667.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $655.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $573.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $559.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $551.0M |
| Q4 25 | $700.8M | $6.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $6.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $6.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $5.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $5.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $5.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $5.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $5.3B |
| Q4 25 | 0.91× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $21.6M | $80.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $21.4M | $71.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 42.7% | 115.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.3% | 13.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.34× | 4.12× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $12.0M | $132.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $21.6M | $80.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.4M | $26.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.2M | $29.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.4M | $11.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $51.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.3M | $16.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $18.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.8M | $12.4M |
| Q4 25 | $21.4M | $71.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-7.3M | $24.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.1M | $27.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $966.4K | $8.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $44.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.4M | $16.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $17.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $218.9K | $12.1M |
| Q4 25 | 42.7% | 115.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -22.2% | 39.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -14.4% | 50.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.2% | 18.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 93.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -12.3% | 37.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 40.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.4% | 28.5% |
| Q4 25 | 0.3% | 13.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 66.1% | 3.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 47.9% | 3.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 32.5% | 5.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 14.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 55.5% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 50.0% | 0.8% |
| Q4 25 | 1.34× | 4.12× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.44× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 6.08× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.84× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.88× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.37× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.53× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.02× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
