vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Logistic Properties of the Americas (LPA) and Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc. (SAMG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Logistic Properties of the Americas is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($50.1M vs $32.0M, roughly 1.6× Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc.). Logistic Properties of the Americas runs the higher net margin — 32.1% vs -0.4%, a 32.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. Logistic Properties of the Americas produced more free cash flow last quarter ($21.4M vs $15.0M).
Logistic Properties of the Americas is a specialized industrial real estate firm that acquires, develops and manages logistics properties across North, Central and South America. Its portfolio includes distribution centers, warehouses and last-mile delivery facilities, serving e-commerce, retail, manufacturing and third-party logistics clients.
LPA vs SAMG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $50.1M | $32.0M |
| Net Profit | $16.1M | $-120.0K |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 81.7% | -2.8% |
| Net Margin | 32.1% | -0.4% |
| Revenue YoY | — | -0.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -107.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.33 | $0.02 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $50.1M | $32.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $32.7M | $31.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.5M | $30.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.5M | $31.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $32.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.2M | $30.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $31.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.2M | $30.3M |
| Q4 25 | $16.1M | $-120.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $618.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.0M |
| Q4 25 | 81.7% | -2.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 13.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 15.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 6.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 14.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 17.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 19.5% |
| Q4 25 | 32.1% | -0.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 6.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 7.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 5.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 7.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 8.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 9.9% |
| Q4 25 | $0.33 | $0.02 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.09 | $0.07 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.06 | $0.21 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.26 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.16 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.26 | $0.24 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.28 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.32 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $27.3M | $44.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $296.8M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $324.6M | $50.3M |
| Total Assets | $700.8M | $166.6M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.91× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $27.3M | $44.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $36.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $30.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $36.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $68.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $58.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $49.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1M | $39.7M |
| Q4 25 | $296.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $324.6M | $50.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $58.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $64.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $80.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $80.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $84.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $85.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $83.9M |
| Q4 25 | $700.8M | $166.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $157.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $152.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $159.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $194.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $184.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $177.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $170.2M |
| Q4 25 | 0.91× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $21.6M | $18.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $21.4M | $15.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 42.7% | 46.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.3% | 11.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.34× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $12.0M | $17.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $21.6M | $18.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.4M | $14.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.2M | $13.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.4M | $-24.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $21.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.3M | $13.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $16.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.8M | $-24.1M |
| Q4 25 | $21.4M | $15.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-7.3M | $13.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.1M | $13.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $966.4K | $-25.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $19.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.4M | $12.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $15.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $218.9K | $-24.7M |
| Q4 25 | 42.7% | 46.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -22.2% | 44.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -14.4% | 43.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.2% | -80.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 62.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -12.3% | 42.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 50.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.4% | -81.6% |
| Q4 25 | 0.3% | 11.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 66.1% | 2.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 47.9% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 32.5% | 1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 5.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 55.5% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 50.0% | 2.0% |
| Q4 25 | 1.34× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 23.62× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 7.22× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -10.01× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 13.34× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 5.90× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 6.00× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -8.03× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LPA
Segment breakdown not available.
SAMG
| Investment Advisory Management And Administrative Service | $30.7M | 96% |
| Tax And Family Office Services | $1.2M | 4% |
