vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of La Rosa Holdings Corp. (LRHC) and Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
La Rosa Holdings Corp. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($20.2M vs $15.8M, roughly 1.3× Spire Global, Inc.). La Rosa Holdings Corp. runs the higher net margin — -27.4% vs -176.6%, a 149.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, La Rosa Holdings Corp. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (3.2% vs -26.9%). Over the past eight quarters, La Rosa Holdings Corp.'s revenue compounded faster (72.5% CAGR vs -32.6%).
V. La Rosa and Sons Macaroni Company was founded in 1914 by Vincenzo La Rosa, a Sicilian immigrant. The company eventually became one of the largest regional brands in the United States producing over 40 varieties of pasta.
Spire Global, Inc. is a space-to-cloud data and analytics company that specializes in the tracking of global data sets powered by a large constellation of nanosatellites, such as the tracking of maritime, aviation and weather patterns.
LRHC vs SPIR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $20.2M | $15.8M |
| Net Profit | $-5.5M | $-28.0M |
| Gross Margin | 8.4% | 40.2% |
| Operating Margin | -24.7% | -164.1% |
| Net Margin | -27.4% | -176.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 3.2% | -26.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -125.7% | 42.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-5.44 | $-0.85 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $15.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $20.2M | $12.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.2M | $19.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.5M | $23.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.7M | $21.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.6M | $28.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.1M | $25.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $13.1M | $34.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-28.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-5.5M | $-19.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $78.4M | $119.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-95.7M | $-20.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-5.1M | $-48.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.5M | $-12.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.3M | $-16.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.6M | $-25.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | 40.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.4% | 36.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.0% | 48.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.8% | 36.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.9% | 32.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.3% | 44.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.3% | 43.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.9% | 26.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | -164.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -24.7% | -166.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -10.6% | -122.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -26.7% | -106.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -17.1% | -144.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -8.9% | -48.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -9.7% | -48.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -35.0% | -34.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | -176.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -27.4% | -155.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 337.8% | 623.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -546.5% | -86.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -28.7% | -225.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -12.5% | -43.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -12.2% | -65.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -35.1% | -73.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.85 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-5.44 | $-0.61 | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.25 | $3.72 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.86 | $-0.77 | ||
| Q4 24 | $28.54 | $-1.93 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-16.49 | $-0.50 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-12.49 | $-0.68 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.35 | $-1.17 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $4.0M | $81.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $642.8K | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.6M | $112.9M |
| Total Assets | $21.7M | $211.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.41× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $81.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0M | $96.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.1M | $117.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.9M | $35.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4M | $19.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8M | $36.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6M | $45.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1M | $63.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $642.8K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $644.3K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $645.9K | $103.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $647.6K | $103.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $649.2K | $4.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $650.8K | $4.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $652.4K | $123.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $112.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6M | $133.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.4M | $149.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-87.5M | $3.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.6M | $-11.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.0M | $30.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.7M | $40.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.6M | $52.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $211.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $21.7M | $224.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.9M | $239.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $21.0M | $208.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.4M | $193.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.7M | $224.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.7M | $230.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $16.3M | $252.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.41× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.19× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 27.92× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.25× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.13× | 0.16× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.14× | 0.12× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.12× | 2.35× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-1.3M | $-4.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-16.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -102.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 75.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-92.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-4.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.3M | $-12.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.4M | $-35.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.5M | $-8.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.1M | $-19.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-591.6K | $14.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-803.1K | $-4.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-538.3K | $-8.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-16.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-20.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-38.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-17.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-24.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $5.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-9.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-15.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | -102.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -161.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -201.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -72.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -112.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 17.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -39.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -45.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 75.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 66.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 18.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 37.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 23.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 31.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 21.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 20.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.02× | -0.29× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LRHC
| Real Estate Residential Brokerage Services | $16.8M | 83% |
| Transferred Over Time | $3.5M | 17% |
SPIR
Segment breakdown not available.
