vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of La Rosa Holdings Corp. (LRHC) and Voyager Technologies, Inc. (VOYG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Voyager Technologies, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($46.7M vs $20.2M, roughly 2.3× La Rosa Holdings Corp.). La Rosa Holdings Corp. runs the higher net margin — -27.4% vs -70.7%, a 43.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Voyager Technologies, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (23.7% vs 3.2%).
V. La Rosa and Sons Macaroni Company was founded in 1914 by Vincenzo La Rosa, a Sicilian immigrant. The company eventually became one of the largest regional brands in the United States producing over 40 varieties of pasta.
LRHC vs VOYG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $20.2M | $46.7M |
| Net Profit | $-5.5M | $-33.0M |
| Gross Margin | 8.4% | 21.4% |
| Operating Margin | -24.7% | — |
| Net Margin | -27.4% | -70.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 3.2% | 23.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -125.7% | -71.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-5.44 | $-0.52 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $46.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $20.2M | $39.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.2M | $45.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $13.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $-33.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-5.5M | $-16.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $78.4M | $-31.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-95.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-5.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 21.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.4% | 15.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.0% | 18.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -24.7% | -60.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -10.6% | -52.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -26.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -17.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -8.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -9.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -35.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -70.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -27.4% | -41.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 337.8% | -68.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -546.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -28.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -12.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -12.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -35.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.52 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-5.44 | $-0.28 | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.25 | $-1.23 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.86 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $28.54 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-16.49 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-12.49 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.35 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $4.0M | $491.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $642.8K | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.6M | — |
| Total Assets | $21.7M | — |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.41× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $491.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0M | $413.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.1M | $468.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $642.8K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $644.3K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $645.9K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $647.6K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $649.2K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $650.8K | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $652.4K | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6M | $590.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.4M | $554.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-87.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $21.7M | $727.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.9M | $685.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $21.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $16.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.41× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.19× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.25× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.13× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.14× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.12× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-1.3M | $-60.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-54.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -116.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-60.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.3M | $-15.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.4M | $-30.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-591.6K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-803.1K | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-538.3K | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $-54.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-53.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-88.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -116.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -135.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -194.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 97.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 126.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.02× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LRHC
| Real Estate Residential Brokerage Services | $16.8M | 83% |
| Transferred Over Time | $3.5M | 17% |
VOYG
| Defense and National Security | $35.7M | 77% |
| Space Solutions | $12.5M | 27% |
