vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of LATTICE SEMICONDUCTOR CORP (LSCC) and MATRIX SERVICE CO (MTRX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
MATRIX SERVICE CO is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($210.5M vs $145.8M, roughly 1.4× LATTICE SEMICONDUCTOR CORP). MATRIX SERVICE CO runs the higher net margin — -0.4% vs -5.2%, a 4.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, MATRIX SERVICE CO posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (12.5% vs 9.3%). LATTICE SEMICONDUCTOR CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($44.0M vs $6.3M). Over the past eight quarters, MATRIX SERVICE CO's revenue compounded faster (12.6% CAGR vs 8.4%).
Lattice Semiconductor Corporation is an American semiconductor company specializing in the design and manufacturing of low power field-programmable gate arrays (FPGAs). Headquartered in the Silicon Forest area of Hillsboro, Oregon, the company also has operations in San Jose, Calif., Shanghai, Manila, Penang, and Singapore. Lattice Semiconductor has more than 1000 employees and an annual revenue of more than $660 million as of 2022. The company was founded in 1983 and went public in 1989. It ...
Matrix Telecom, Inc., operating as Matrix Business Technologies, Trinsic, Powered by Matrix, Excel Telecommunications and various other niche brands is a United States telecommunications firm that provides voice and data services to consumers and small and medium businesses as well as multi-location distributed enterprise markets. The firm also provides wholesale voice services to the telecommunications, wireless and cable industries.
LSCC vs MTRX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $145.8M | $210.5M |
| Net Profit | $-7.6M | $-894.0K |
| Gross Margin | 68.5% | 6.2% |
| Operating Margin | 30.7% | -1.0% |
| Net Margin | -5.2% | -0.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 9.3% | 12.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 14.6% | 83.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.06 | $-0.03 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $145.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $210.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $133.3M | $211.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $124.0M | $216.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $120.2M | $200.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $117.4M | $187.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $127.1M | $165.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $124.1M | $189.5M |
| Q1 26 | $-7.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-894.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.8M | $-3.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.9M | $-11.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.0M | $-3.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.5M | $-5.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.2M | $-9.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $22.6M | $-4.4M |
| Q1 26 | 68.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 6.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 67.9% | 6.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 68.4% | 3.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 68.0% | 6.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 61.1% | 5.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 69.0% | 4.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 68.3% | 6.6% |
| Q1 26 | 0.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -1.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.2% | -2.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.8% | -6.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.8% | -2.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -10.4% | -3.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.9% | -6.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.2% | -2.8% |
| Q1 26 | -5.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -0.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.1% | -1.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.3% | -5.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.2% | -1.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.1% | -3.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.7% | -5.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.2% | -2.3% |
| Q1 26 | $-0.06 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.03 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.02 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.02 | $-0.41 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.04 | $-0.12 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.12 | $-0.20 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.05 | $-0.33 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.16 | $-0.16 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $133.9M | $199.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $714.1M | $137.6M |
| Total Assets | — | $650.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $133.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $199.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $117.9M | $192.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $107.2M | $224.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $127.6M | $185.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $136.3M | $156.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $124.3M | $124.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $109.2M | $115.6M |
| Q1 26 | $714.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $137.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $706.4M | $136.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $687.0M | $142.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $707.9M | $150.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $710.9M | $151.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $703.5M | $156.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $698.8M | $164.2M |
| Q1 26 | $883.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $650.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $844.4M | $598.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $808.6M | $600.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $823.6M | $613.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $843.9M | $513.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $853.7M | $470.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $827.5M | $451.4M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $57.6M | $7.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $44.0M | $6.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 30.2% | 3.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $153.3M | $45.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $57.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $7.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $47.1M | $-25.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $38.5M | $40.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $31.9M | $31.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $45.4M | $33.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $44.0M | $11.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.9M | $47.0M |
| Q1 26 | $44.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $6.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $34.0M | $-27.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $31.3M | $38.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.3M | $28.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $39.7M | $32.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $39.4M | $10.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.8M | $45.7M |
| Q1 26 | 30.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 3.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.5% | -13.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.2% | 17.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.4% | 14.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 33.8% | 17.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 31.0% | 6.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.9% | 24.1% |
| Q1 26 | 9.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.8% | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.8% | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.2% | 1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.9% | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.7% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.8% | 0.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.86× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.23× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.35× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.75× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.12× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.97× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LSCC
Segment breakdown not available.
MTRX
| Storage And Terminal Solutions | $99.9M | 47% |
| Utility And Power Infrastructure | $75.4M | 36% |
| Process And Industrial Facilities | $35.3M | 17% |
