vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Laird Superfood, Inc. (LSF) and Navitas Semiconductor Corp (NVTS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Laird Superfood, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($13.3M vs $7.3M, roughly 1.8× Navitas Semiconductor Corp). Laird Superfood, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -13.2% vs -436.1%, a 422.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Laird Superfood, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.0% vs -59.4%). Over the past eight quarters, Laird Superfood, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (16.1% CAGR vs -43.9%).
Laird Superfood, Inc. develops, manufactures and sells a portfolio of plant-based functional superfood products, including premium coffee creamers, hydration blends, nutritional supplements, and plant-powered snacks. It serves health-conscious consumers through direct-to-consumer e-commerce platforms and offline retail partners, mainly operating in the North American market with a focus on sustainably sourced clean ingredients.
Navitas Semiconductor Corp is a leading global semiconductor firm specializing in gallium nitride (GaN) power integrated circuits. Its high-efficiency, compact power solutions serve consumer electronics, electric vehicles, renewable energy, and industrial sectors, with clients spanning North America, Asia, and Europe.
LSF vs NVTS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $13.3M | $7.3M |
| Net Profit | $-1.8M | $-31.8M |
| Gross Margin | 34.1% | 38.1% |
| Operating Margin | -13.5% | -567.3% |
| Net Margin | -13.2% | -436.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 15.0% | -59.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -341.4% | 20.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.14 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $13.3M | $7.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.9M | $10.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.0M | $14.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.7M | $14.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.6M | $18.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.8M | $21.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.0M | $20.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.9M | $23.2M |
| Q4 25 | $-1.8M | $-31.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-975.1K | $-19.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-362.2K | $-49.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-156.2K | $-16.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-398.4K | $-39.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-166.1K | $-18.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-239.1K | $-22.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.0M | $-3.7M |
| Q4 25 | 34.1% | 38.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 36.5% | 37.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 39.9% | 16.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 41.9% | 37.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 38.6% | 12.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 43.0% | 39.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 41.8% | 39.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 40.0% | 41.1% |
| Q4 25 | -13.5% | -567.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -7.7% | -192.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.3% | -149.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.9% | -180.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -4.1% | -216.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.3% | -133.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -3.4% | -152.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -11.0% | -136.2% |
| Q4 25 | -13.2% | -436.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -7.6% | -190.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.0% | -338.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.3% | -120.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.4% | -221.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.4% | -86.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.4% | -109.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -10.3% | -15.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.14 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.09 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.25 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.09 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.22 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.10 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.12 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.02 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $5.1M | $236.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $11.5M | $443.7M |
| Total Assets | $19.2M | $500.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $5.1M | $236.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.1M | $150.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.9M | $161.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.0M | $75.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.3M | $86.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.9M | $98.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.6M | $111.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.1M | $128.9M |
| Q4 25 | $11.5M | $443.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.8M | $371.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.4M | $388.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.3M | $341.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.2M | $348.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.1M | $380.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.6M | $388.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.7M | $397.9M |
| Q4 25 | $19.2M | $500.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.9M | $430.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.4M | $449.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $21.5M | $370.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.3M | $390.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.8M | $419.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.0M | $439.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $17.6M | $467.9M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $68.4K | $-8.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-8.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -111.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-44.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $68.4K | $-8.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2M | $-10.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.8M | $-11.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.3M | $-13.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $339.2K | $-10.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $305.8K | $-13.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $642.7K | $-15.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-422.3K | $-19.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-8.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-10.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-11.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-13.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-10.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-14.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-17.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-22.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | -111.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -106.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -82.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -96.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -59.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -65.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -87.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -97.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 7.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 13.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 12.5% |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LSF
| Wholesale | $7.0M | 52% |
| Coffee Tea And Hot Chocolate Products | $4.4M | 33% |
| Hydration And Beverage Enhancing Supplements | $1.6M | 12% |
| Other | $352.6K | 3% |
NVTS
Segment breakdown not available.
