vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Laird Superfood, Inc. (LSF) and SYNTEC OPTICS HOLDINGS, INC. (OPTX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Laird Superfood, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($13.3M vs $7.5M, roughly 1.8× SYNTEC OPTICS HOLDINGS, INC.). SYNTEC OPTICS HOLDINGS, INC. runs the higher net margin — -4.6% vs -13.2%, a 8.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Laird Superfood, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.0% vs 2.5%). Over the past eight quarters, Laird Superfood, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (16.1% CAGR vs 9.5%).
Laird Superfood, Inc. develops, manufactures and sells a portfolio of plant-based functional superfood products, including premium coffee creamers, hydration blends, nutritional supplements, and plant-powered snacks. It serves health-conscious consumers through direct-to-consumer e-commerce platforms and offline retail partners, mainly operating in the North American market with a focus on sustainably sourced clean ingredients.
LSF vs OPTX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $13.3M | $7.5M |
| Net Profit | $-1.8M | $-343.8K |
| Gross Margin | 34.1% | 23.6% |
| Operating Margin | -13.5% | 4.2% |
| Net Margin | -13.2% | -4.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 15.0% | 2.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -341.4% | 77.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.01 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $13.3M | $7.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.9M | $7.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.0M | $6.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.7M | $7.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.6M | $7.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.8M | $7.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.0M | $7.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.9M | $6.3M |
| Q4 25 | $-1.8M | $-343.8K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-975.1K | $-1.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-362.2K | $-343.9K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-156.2K | $323.7K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-398.4K | $-1.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-166.1K | $-13.3K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-239.1K | $281.8K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.0M | $-1.2M |
| Q4 25 | 34.1% | 23.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 36.5% | 12.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 39.9% | 24.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 41.9% | 32.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 38.6% | 13.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 43.0% | 23.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 41.8% | 31.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 40.0% | 11.3% |
| Q4 25 | -13.5% | 4.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -7.7% | -17.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.3% | -2.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.9% | 7.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -4.1% | -19.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.3% | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -3.4% | 2.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -11.0% | -22.5% |
| Q4 25 | -13.2% | -4.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -7.6% | -20.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.0% | -5.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.3% | 4.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.4% | -21.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.4% | -0.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.4% | 4.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -10.3% | -19.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.01 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.04 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.01 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.01 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.05 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.00 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.01 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.03 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $5.1M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $2.6M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $11.5M | $9.5M |
| Total Assets | $19.2M | $24.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.28× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $5.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.0M |
| Q4 25 | $11.5M | $9.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.8M | $9.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.4M | $11.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.3M | $11.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.2M | $11.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.1M | $12.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.6M | $12.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.7M | $11.9M |
| Q4 25 | $19.2M | $24.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.9M | $24.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.4M | $25.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $21.5M | $26.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.3M | $26.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.8M | $27.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.0M | $25.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $17.6M | $24.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.28× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.28× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.26× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.26× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.28× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.26× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.23× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.25× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $68.4K | $-3.9K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-4.4K |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -0.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $28.3K |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $68.4K | $-3.9K | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2M | $535.3K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.8M | $-158.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.3M | $299.3K | ||
| Q4 24 | $339.2K | $623.8K | ||
| Q3 24 | $305.8K | $417.3K | ||
| Q2 24 | $642.7K | $-1.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-422.3K | $-289.8K |
| Q4 25 | — | $-4.4K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $496.3K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-548.1K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $84.6K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $12.1K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $43.8K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-1.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-385.1K |
| Q4 25 | — | -0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 7.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -8.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -26.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -6.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 5.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 8.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.92× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -6.01× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LSF
| Wholesale | $7.0M | 52% |
| Coffee Tea And Hot Chocolate Products | $4.4M | 33% |
| Hydration And Beverage Enhancing Supplements | $1.6M | 12% |
| Other | $352.6K | 3% |
OPTX
Segment breakdown not available.
