vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Laird Superfood, Inc. (LSF) and Protalix BioTherapeutics, Inc. (PLX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Laird Superfood, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($13.3M vs $9.1M, roughly 1.5× Protalix BioTherapeutics, Inc.). Laird Superfood, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -13.2% vs -60.3%, a 47.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Laird Superfood, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.0% vs -49.9%). Over the past eight quarters, Laird Superfood, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (16.1% CAGR vs -6.7%).

Laird Superfood, Inc. develops, manufactures and sells a portfolio of plant-based functional superfood products, including premium coffee creamers, hydration blends, nutritional supplements, and plant-powered snacks. It serves health-conscious consumers through direct-to-consumer e-commerce platforms and offline retail partners, mainly operating in the North American market with a focus on sustainably sourced clean ingredients.

Protalix BioTherapeutics is an Israeli pharmaceutical company that manufactures a plant-based enzyme, taliglucerase alfa, which has received U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval for the treatment of Gaucher disease.

LSF vs PLX — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
LSF
LSF
1.5× larger
LSF
$13.3M
$9.1M
PLX
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
LSF
LSF
+64.9% gap
LSF
15.0%
-49.9%
PLX
Higher net margin
LSF
LSF
47.2% more per $
LSF
-13.2%
-60.3%
PLX
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
LSF
LSF
Annualised
LSF
16.1%
-6.7%
PLX

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
LSF
LSF
PLX
PLX
Revenue
$13.3M
$9.1M
Net Profit
$-1.8M
$-5.5M
Gross Margin
34.1%
49.4%
Operating Margin
-13.5%
-51.1%
Net Margin
-13.2%
-60.3%
Revenue YoY
15.0%
-49.9%
Net Profit YoY
-341.4%
-184.8%
EPS (diluted)
$-0.06

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
LSF
LSF
PLX
PLX
Q4 25
$13.3M
$9.1M
Q3 25
$12.9M
$17.9M
Q2 25
$12.0M
$15.7M
Q1 25
$11.7M
$10.1M
Q4 24
$11.6M
$18.2M
Q3 24
$11.8M
$18.0M
Q2 24
$10.0M
$13.5M
Q1 24
$9.9M
Net Profit
LSF
LSF
PLX
PLX
Q4 25
$-1.8M
$-5.5M
Q3 25
$-975.1K
$2.4M
Q2 25
$-362.2K
$164.0K
Q1 25
$-156.2K
$-3.6M
Q4 24
$-398.4K
$6.5M
Q3 24
$-166.1K
$3.2M
Q2 24
$-239.1K
$-2.2M
Q1 24
$-1.0M
Gross Margin
LSF
LSF
PLX
PLX
Q4 25
34.1%
49.4%
Q3 25
36.5%
53.4%
Q2 25
39.9%
62.5%
Q1 25
41.9%
19.1%
Q4 24
38.6%
78.7%
Q3 24
43.0%
53.4%
Q2 24
41.8%
29.8%
Q1 24
40.0%
Operating Margin
LSF
LSF
PLX
PLX
Q4 25
-13.5%
-51.1%
Q3 25
-7.7%
11.9%
Q2 25
-3.3%
7.5%
Q1 25
-1.9%
-41.0%
Q4 24
-4.1%
39.6%
Q3 24
-2.3%
22.2%
Q2 24
-3.4%
-18.0%
Q1 24
-11.0%
Net Margin
LSF
LSF
PLX
PLX
Q4 25
-13.2%
-60.3%
Q3 25
-7.6%
13.2%
Q2 25
-3.0%
1.0%
Q1 25
-1.3%
-35.8%
Q4 24
-3.4%
35.6%
Q3 24
-1.4%
18.0%
Q2 24
-2.4%
-16.4%
Q1 24
-10.3%
EPS (diluted)
LSF
LSF
PLX
PLX
Q4 25
$-0.06
Q3 25
$0.03
Q2 25
$0.00
Q1 25
$-0.05
Q4 24
$0.10
Q3 24
$0.03
Q2 24
$-0.03
Q1 24

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
LSF
LSF
PLX
PLX
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$5.1M
$14.7M
Total DebtLower is stronger
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$11.5M
$48.2M
Total Assets
$19.2M
$82.3M
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
LSF
LSF
PLX
PLX
Q4 25
$5.1M
$14.7M
Q3 25
$5.1M
$13.6M
Q2 25
$3.9M
$17.9M
Q1 25
$7.0M
$19.5M
Q4 24
$8.3M
$19.8M
Q3 24
$7.9M
$27.4M
Q2 24
$7.6M
$23.4M
Q1 24
$7.1M
Stockholders' Equity
LSF
LSF
PLX
PLX
Q4 25
$11.5M
$48.2M
Q3 25
$12.8M
$52.9M
Q2 25
$13.4M
$49.9M
Q1 25
$13.3M
$45.2M
Q4 24
$13.2M
$43.2M
Q3 24
$13.1M
$32.4M
Q2 24
$12.6M
$28.6M
Q1 24
$12.7M
Total Assets
LSF
LSF
PLX
PLX
Q4 25
$19.2M
$82.3M
Q3 25
$18.9M
$82.3M
Q2 25
$20.4M
$78.5M
Q1 25
$21.5M
$73.9M
Q4 24
$19.3M
$73.4M
Q3 24
$18.8M
$61.6M
Q2 24
$18.0M
$91.5M
Q1 24
$17.6M

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
LSF
LSF
PLX
PLX
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$68.4K
$2.0M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$1.6M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
17.8%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
4.4%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$-13.6M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
LSF
LSF
PLX
PLX
Q4 25
$68.4K
$2.0M
Q3 25
$1.2M
$-3.7M
Q2 25
$-2.8M
$-5.2M
Q1 25
$-1.3M
$-5.1M
Q4 24
$339.2K
$4.0M
Q3 24
$305.8K
$4.1M
Q2 24
$642.7K
$-3.6M
Q1 24
$-422.3K
Free Cash Flow
LSF
LSF
PLX
PLX
Q4 25
$1.6M
Q3 25
$-4.2M
Q2 25
$-5.7M
Q1 25
$-5.4M
Q4 24
$3.6M
Q3 24
$4.0M
Q2 24
$-3.8M
Q1 24
FCF Margin
LSF
LSF
PLX
PLX
Q4 25
17.8%
Q3 25
-23.7%
Q2 25
-36.2%
Q1 25
-53.0%
Q4 24
19.6%
Q3 24
22.4%
Q2 24
-28.1%
Q1 24
Capex Intensity
LSF
LSF
PLX
PLX
Q4 25
4.4%
Q3 25
2.8%
Q2 25
2.8%
Q1 25
3.0%
Q4 24
2.3%
Q3 24
0.5%
Q2 24
1.3%
Q1 24
Cash Conversion
LSF
LSF
PLX
PLX
Q4 25
Q3 25
-1.58×
Q2 25
-31.91×
Q1 25
Q4 24
0.61×
Q3 24
1.27×
Q2 24
Q1 24

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

LSF
LSF

Wholesale$7.0M52%
Coffee Tea And Hot Chocolate Products$4.4M33%
Hydration And Beverage Enhancing Supplements$1.6M12%
Other$352.6K3%

PLX
PLX

Products$8.7M95%
Other$428.0K5%

Related Comparisons