vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Laird Superfood, Inc. (LSF) and Precipio, Inc. (PRPO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Laird Superfood, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($13.3M vs $6.8M, roughly 2.0× Precipio, Inc.). Precipio, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 7.7% vs -13.2%, a 20.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Precipio, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (28.4% vs 15.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Precipio, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (40.0% CAGR vs 16.1%).
Laird Superfood, Inc. develops, manufactures and sells a portfolio of plant-based functional superfood products, including premium coffee creamers, hydration blends, nutritional supplements, and plant-powered snacks. It serves health-conscious consumers through direct-to-consumer e-commerce platforms and offline retail partners, mainly operating in the North American market with a focus on sustainably sourced clean ingredients.
Precipio, Inc. is a specialty diagnostic firm that develops and provides advanced oncology, genetic, and rare disease testing solutions. It primarily serves healthcare providers, clinical laboratories, and patients across the United States, with a core focus on enhancing diagnostic accuracy and improving patient health outcomes.
LSF vs PRPO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $13.3M | $6.8M |
| Net Profit | $-1.8M | $526.0K |
| Gross Margin | 34.1% | 45.9% |
| Operating Margin | -13.5% | 7.9% |
| Net Margin | -13.2% | 7.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 15.0% | 28.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -341.4% | 244.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.36 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $13.3M | $6.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.9M | $6.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.0M | $5.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.7M | $4.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.6M | $5.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.8M | $5.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.0M | $4.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.9M | $3.5M |
| Q4 25 | $-1.8M | $526.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-975.1K | $-79.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-362.2K | $74.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-156.2K | $-884.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-398.4K | $-365.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-166.1K | $-626.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-239.1K | $-1.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.0M | $-2.1M |
| Q4 25 | 34.1% | 45.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 36.5% | 43.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 39.9% | 43.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 41.9% | 43.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 38.6% | 49.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 43.0% | 43.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 41.8% | 38.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 40.0% | 26.5% |
| Q4 25 | -13.5% | 7.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -7.7% | -0.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.3% | -14.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.9% | -17.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -4.1% | -6.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.3% | -11.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -3.4% | -26.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -11.0% | -59.6% |
| Q4 25 | -13.2% | 7.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -7.6% | -1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.0% | 1.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.3% | -18.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.4% | -6.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.4% | -11.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.4% | -27.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -10.3% | -59.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.36 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.05 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.05 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.59 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.22 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.42 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.83 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-1.46 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $5.1M | $2.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $83.0K |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $11.5M | $14.6M |
| Total Assets | $19.2M | $21.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.01× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $5.1M | $2.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.1M | $2.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.9M | $1.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.0M | $1.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.3M | $1.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.9M | $1.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.6M | $1.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.1M | $776.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | $83.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $383.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $11.5M | $14.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.8M | $13.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.4M | $12.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.3M | $11.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.2M | $12.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.1M | $11.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.6M | $12.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.7M | $12.8M |
| Q4 25 | $19.2M | $21.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.9M | $21.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.4M | $18.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $21.5M | $17.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.3M | $17.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.8M | $17.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.0M | $17.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $17.6M | $16.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.01× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.03× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $68.4K | $366.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $291.0K |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 4.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 0.70× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $359.0K |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $68.4K | $366.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2M | $10.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.8M | $353.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.3M | $-44.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $339.2K | $565.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $305.8K | $41.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $642.7K | $500.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-422.3K | $-667.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | $291.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-44.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $294.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-182.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-68.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 4.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -0.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 5.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -3.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -1.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.70× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.77× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LSF
| Wholesale | $7.0M | 52% |
| Coffee Tea And Hot Chocolate Products | $4.4M | 33% |
| Hydration And Beverage Enhancing Supplements | $1.6M | 12% |
| Other | $352.6K | 3% |
PRPO
Segment breakdown not available.
