vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Laird Superfood, Inc. (LSF) and Postal Realty Trust, Inc. (PSTL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Postal Realty Trust, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($26.0M vs $13.3M, roughly 1.9× Laird Superfood, Inc.). Postal Realty Trust, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 17.9% vs -13.2%, a 31.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Postal Realty Trust, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (21.7% vs 15.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Postal Realty Trust, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (22.6% CAGR vs 16.1%).
Laird Superfood, Inc. develops, manufactures and sells a portfolio of plant-based functional superfood products, including premium coffee creamers, hydration blends, nutritional supplements, and plant-powered snacks. It serves health-conscious consumers through direct-to-consumer e-commerce platforms and offline retail partners, mainly operating in the North American market with a focus on sustainably sourced clean ingredients.
Postal Realty Trust, Inc. is a specialized real estate investment trust that acquires, owns, and manages properties primarily leased to the United States Postal Service. Its portfolio includes last-mile postal facilities, sorting centers, and retail post office locations across the U.S., supporting critical mail and package delivery infrastructure.
LSF vs PSTL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $13.3M | $26.0M |
| Net Profit | $-1.8M | $4.6M |
| Gross Margin | 34.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | -13.5% | 39.2% |
| Net Margin | -13.2% | 17.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 15.0% | 21.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -341.4% | 3.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.16 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $13.3M | $26.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.9M | $24.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.0M | $23.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.7M | $22.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.6M | $21.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.8M | $19.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.0M | $18.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.9M | $17.3M |
| Q4 25 | $-1.8M | $4.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-975.1K | $3.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-362.2K | $3.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-156.2K | $2.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-398.4K | $4.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-166.1K | $1.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-239.1K | $817.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.0M | $206.0K |
| Q4 25 | 34.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 36.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 39.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 41.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 38.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 43.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 41.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 40.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | -13.5% | 39.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -7.7% | 37.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.3% | 37.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.9% | 28.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -4.1% | 43.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.3% | 24.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -3.4% | 22.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -11.0% | 17.6% |
| Q4 25 | -13.2% | 17.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -7.6% | 15.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.0% | 15.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.3% | 9.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.4% | 21.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.4% | 5.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.4% | 4.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -10.3% | 1.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.16 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.13 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.12 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.06 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.17 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.03 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.02 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.01 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $5.1M | $1.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $361.1M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $11.5M | $285.2M |
| Total Assets | $19.2M | $759.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.27× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $5.1M | $1.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.1M | $1.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.9M | $1.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.0M | $639.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.3M | $1.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.9M | $970.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.6M | $1.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.1M | $1.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $361.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $347.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $328.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $306.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $296.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $277.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $273.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $247.6M |
| Q4 25 | $11.5M | $285.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.8M | $273.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.4M | $250.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.3M | $245.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.2M | $251.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.1M | $245.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.6M | $245.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.7M | $248.1M |
| Q4 25 | $19.2M | $759.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.9M | $735.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.4M | $689.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $21.5M | $654.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.3M | $646.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.8M | $615.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.0M | $608.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $17.6M | $584.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.27× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.27× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.31× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.25× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.18× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.13× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.11× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.00× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $68.4K | $44.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $37.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 144.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 26.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 9.59× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $65.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $68.4K | $44.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2M | $10.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.8M | $11.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.3M | $10.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $339.2K | $33.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $305.8K | $8.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $642.7K | $9.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-422.3K | $6.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | $37.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $8.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $9.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $10.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $30.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $7.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $8.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $5.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | 144.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 36.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 38.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 45.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 143.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 37.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 49.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 33.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | 26.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 8.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 10.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 13.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 5.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | 9.59× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.87× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.16× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 5.20× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.44× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 7.48× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 12.10× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 31.07× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LSF
| Wholesale | $7.0M | 52% |
| Coffee Tea And Hot Chocolate Products | $4.4M | 33% |
| Hydration And Beverage Enhancing Supplements | $1.6M | 12% |
| Other | $352.6K | 3% |
PSTL
Segment breakdown not available.
