vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Laird Superfood, Inc. (LSF) and Stabilis Solutions, Inc. (SLNG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Laird Superfood, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($13.3M vs $13.3M, roughly 1.0× Stabilis Solutions, Inc.). Stabilis Solutions, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -2.0% vs -13.2%, a 11.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Laird Superfood, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.0% vs -23.3%). Over the past eight quarters, Laird Superfood, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (16.1% CAGR vs -18.1%).
Laird Superfood, Inc. develops, manufactures and sells a portfolio of plant-based functional superfood products, including premium coffee creamers, hydration blends, nutritional supplements, and plant-powered snacks. It serves health-conscious consumers through direct-to-consumer e-commerce platforms and offline retail partners, mainly operating in the North American market with a focus on sustainably sourced clean ingredients.
Stabilis Solutions, Inc.SLNGEarnings & Financial Report
Stabilis Solutions, Inc. is a leading North American small-scale liquefied natural gas (LNG) producer and distributor. It supplies LNG fuel, cryogenic services, and full-cycle energy solutions to industrial, remote power, transportation, and commercial clients across the United States and Canada, advancing low-emission energy transition efforts.
LSF vs SLNG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $13.3M | $13.3M |
| Net Profit | $-1.8M | $-262.0K |
| Gross Margin | 34.1% | 24.7% |
| Operating Margin | -13.5% | -2.4% |
| Net Margin | -13.2% | -2.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 15.0% | -23.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -341.4% | -112.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $13.3M | $13.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.9M | $20.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.0M | $17.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.7M | $17.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.6M | $17.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.8M | $17.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.0M | $18.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.9M | $19.8M |
| Q4 25 | $-1.8M | $-262.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-975.1K | $1.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-362.2K | $-613.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-156.2K | $-1.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-398.4K | $2.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-166.1K | $997.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-239.1K | $27.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.0M | $1.5M |
| Q4 25 | 34.1% | 24.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 36.5% | 27.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 39.9% | 26.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 41.9% | 26.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 38.6% | 28.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 43.0% | 28.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 41.8% | 27.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 40.0% | 31.6% |
| Q4 25 | -13.5% | -2.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -7.7% | 5.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.3% | -2.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.9% | -9.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -4.1% | 12.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.3% | 5.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -3.4% | 2.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -11.0% | 7.8% |
| Q4 25 | -13.2% | -2.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -7.6% | 5.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.0% | -3.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.3% | -9.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.4% | 12.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.4% | 5.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.4% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -10.3% | 7.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.06 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.03 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.09 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.12 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.05 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.00 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.08 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $5.1M | $7.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $7.9M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $11.5M | $66.7M |
| Total Assets | $19.2M | $83.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.12× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $5.1M | $7.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.1M | $10.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.9M | $12.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.0M | $9.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.3M | $9.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.9M | $12.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.6M | $11.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.1M | $8.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $7.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $8.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $7.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $8.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $8.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $9.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $8.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $9.1M |
| Q4 25 | $11.5M | $66.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.8M | $66.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.4M | $65.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.3M | $65.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.2M | $67.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.1M | $65.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.6M | $63.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.7M | $63.2M |
| Q4 25 | $19.2M | $83.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.9M | $87.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.4M | $83.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $21.5M | $83.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.3M | $85.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.8M | $89.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.0M | $82.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $17.6M | $80.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.12× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.12× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.12× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.13× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.13× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.14× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.13× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.14× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $68.4K | $669.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-2.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -18.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 23.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $462.0K |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $68.4K | $669.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2M | $2.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.8M | $4.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.3M | $1.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $339.2K | $2.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $305.8K | $2.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $642.7K | $5.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-422.3K | $3.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-2.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-1.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $538.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-3.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | -18.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -7.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 22.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -19.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 7.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 19.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 15.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | 23.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 19.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 32.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 7.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 7.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 4.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.14× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.03× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.56× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 186.59× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.67× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LSF
| Wholesale | $7.0M | 52% |
| Coffee Tea And Hot Chocolate Products | $4.4M | 33% |
| Hydration And Beverage Enhancing Supplements | $1.6M | 12% |
| Other | $352.6K | 3% |
SLNG
| Natural Gas Gathering Transportation Marketing And Processing | $11.1M | 84% |
| Other | $1.3M | 10% |
| Services | $897.0K | 7% |
