vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Laird Superfood, Inc. (LSF) and Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Spire Global, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($15.8M vs $13.3M, roughly 1.2× Laird Superfood, Inc.). Laird Superfood, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -13.2% vs -176.6%, a 163.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Laird Superfood, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.0% vs -26.9%). Over the past eight quarters, Laird Superfood, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (16.1% CAGR vs -32.6%).
Laird Superfood, Inc. develops, manufactures and sells a portfolio of plant-based functional superfood products, including premium coffee creamers, hydration blends, nutritional supplements, and plant-powered snacks. It serves health-conscious consumers through direct-to-consumer e-commerce platforms and offline retail partners, mainly operating in the North American market with a focus on sustainably sourced clean ingredients.
Spire Global, Inc. is a space-to-cloud data and analytics company that specializes in the tracking of global data sets powered by a large constellation of nanosatellites, such as the tracking of maritime, aviation and weather patterns.
LSF vs SPIR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $13.3M | $15.8M |
| Net Profit | $-1.8M | $-28.0M |
| Gross Margin | 34.1% | 40.2% |
| Operating Margin | -13.5% | -164.1% |
| Net Margin | -13.2% | -176.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 15.0% | -26.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -341.4% | 42.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.85 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $13.3M | $15.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.9M | $12.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.0M | $19.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.7M | $23.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.6M | $21.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.8M | $28.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.0M | $25.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.9M | $34.8M |
| Q4 25 | $-1.8M | $-28.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-975.1K | $-19.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-362.2K | $119.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-156.2K | $-20.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-398.4K | $-48.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-166.1K | $-12.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-239.1K | $-16.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.0M | $-25.5M |
| Q4 25 | 34.1% | 40.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 36.5% | 36.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 39.9% | 48.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 41.9% | 36.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 38.6% | 32.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 43.0% | 44.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 41.8% | 43.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 40.0% | 26.5% |
| Q4 25 | -13.5% | -164.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -7.7% | -166.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.3% | -122.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.9% | -106.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -4.1% | -144.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.3% | -48.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -3.4% | -48.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -11.0% | -34.4% |
| Q4 25 | -13.2% | -176.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -7.6% | -155.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.0% | 623.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.3% | -86.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.4% | -225.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.4% | -43.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.4% | -65.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -10.3% | -73.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.85 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.61 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.72 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.77 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-1.93 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.50 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.68 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-1.17 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $5.1M | $81.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $11.5M | $112.9M |
| Total Assets | $19.2M | $211.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $5.1M | $81.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.1M | $96.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.9M | $117.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.0M | $35.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.3M | $19.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.9M | $36.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.6M | $45.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.1M | $63.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $103.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $103.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $4.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $123.1M |
| Q4 25 | $11.5M | $112.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.8M | $133.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.4M | $149.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.3M | $3.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.2M | $-11.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.1M | $30.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.6M | $40.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.7M | $52.5M |
| Q4 25 | $19.2M | $211.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.9M | $224.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.4M | $239.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $21.5M | $208.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.3M | $193.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.8M | $224.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.0M | $230.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $17.6M | $252.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 27.92× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.16× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.12× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.35× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $68.4K | $-4.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-16.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -102.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 75.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-92.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $68.4K | $-4.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2M | $-12.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.8M | $-35.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.3M | $-8.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $339.2K | $-19.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $305.8K | $14.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $642.7K | $-4.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-422.3K | $-8.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-16.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-20.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-38.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-17.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-24.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $5.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-9.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-15.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | -102.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -161.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -201.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -72.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -112.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 17.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -39.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -45.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 75.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 66.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 18.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 37.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 23.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 31.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 21.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 20.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -0.29× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LSF
| Wholesale | $7.0M | 52% |
| Coffee Tea And Hot Chocolate Products | $4.4M | 33% |
| Hydration And Beverage Enhancing Supplements | $1.6M | 12% |
| Other | $352.6K | 3% |
SPIR
Segment breakdown not available.
