vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Laird Superfood, Inc. (LSF) and Tectonic Financial, Inc. (TECTP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Tectonic Financial, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($23.0M vs $13.3M, roughly 1.7× Laird Superfood, Inc.). Tectonic Financial, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 23.8% vs -13.2%, a 37.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Tectonic Financial, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (17.9% vs 15.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Tectonic Financial, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (270.5% CAGR vs 16.1%).
Laird Superfood, Inc. develops, manufactures and sells a portfolio of plant-based functional superfood products, including premium coffee creamers, hydration blends, nutritional supplements, and plant-powered snacks. It serves health-conscious consumers through direct-to-consumer e-commerce platforms and offline retail partners, mainly operating in the North American market with a focus on sustainably sourced clean ingredients.
Tectonic Financial, Inc.TECTPEarnings & Financial Report
Tectonic Financial, Inc. is a US-based diversified financial services provider. It offers core services including wealth management, investment banking, capital markets advisory, and tailored financial solutions. Its key client segments cover high-net-worth individuals, institutional investors, and small to mid-sized enterprises across North America.
LSF vs TECTP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $13.3M | $23.0M |
| Net Profit | $-1.8M | $5.5M |
| Gross Margin | 34.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | -13.5% | 30.6% |
| Net Margin | -13.2% | 23.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 15.0% | 17.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -341.4% | 15.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.73 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $13.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.9M | $23.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.0M | $21.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.7M | $21.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.6M | $21.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.8M | $19.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.0M | $18.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.9M | $17.6M |
| Q4 25 | $-1.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-975.1K | $5.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-362.2K | $4.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-156.2K | $4.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-398.4K | $3.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-166.1K | $4.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-239.1K | $3.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.0M | $3.1M |
| Q4 25 | 34.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 36.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 39.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 41.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 38.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 43.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 41.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 40.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | -13.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -7.7% | 30.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.3% | 25.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.9% | 26.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -4.1% | 22.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.3% | 29.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -3.4% | 21.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -11.0% | 22.2% |
| Q4 25 | -13.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -7.6% | 23.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.0% | 19.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.3% | 20.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.4% | 14.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.4% | 24.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.4% | 16.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -10.3% | 17.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.73 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.55 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.57 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.35 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.58 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.38 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.37 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $5.1M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $11.5M | $119.2M |
| Total Assets | $19.2M | $1.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $5.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | $11.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.8M | $119.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.4M | $114.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.3M | $111.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.2M | $113.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.1M | $112.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.6M | $110.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.7M | $108.5M |
| Q4 25 | $19.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.9M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.4M | $997.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $21.5M | $910.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.3M | $863.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.8M | $847.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.0M | $777.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $17.6M | $777.6M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $68.4K | $-17.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-17.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -74.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -3.14× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $68.4K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2M | $-17.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.8M | $-32.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.3M | $-35.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $339.2K | $-86.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $305.8K | $-22.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $642.7K | $-30.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-422.3K | $-3.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-17.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-35.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-86.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-22.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-30.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-3.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -74.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -163.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -406.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -115.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -165.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -18.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -3.14× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -7.61× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -8.00× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -28.99× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -4.74× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -9.76× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -1.03× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LSF
| Wholesale | $7.0M | 52% |
| Coffee Tea And Hot Chocolate Products | $4.4M | 33% |
| Hydration And Beverage Enhancing Supplements | $1.6M | 12% |
| Other | $352.6K | 3% |
TECTP
Segment breakdown not available.
