vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Laird Superfood, Inc. (LSF) and TECHPRECISION CORP (TPCS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Laird Superfood, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($13.3M vs $7.1M, roughly 1.9× TECHPRECISION CORP). Laird Superfood, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -13.2% vs -20.8%, a 7.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Laird Superfood, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.0% vs -6.9%). Over the past eight quarters, Laird Superfood, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (16.1% CAGR vs -9.2%).
Laird Superfood, Inc. develops, manufactures and sells a portfolio of plant-based functional superfood products, including premium coffee creamers, hydration blends, nutritional supplements, and plant-powered snacks. It serves health-conscious consumers through direct-to-consumer e-commerce platforms and offline retail partners, mainly operating in the North American market with a focus on sustainably sourced clean ingredients.
TechPrecision Corp is a manufacturer of custom high-precision metal fabricated components and integrated systems, serving aerospace, defense, medical technology, renewable energy, and industrial end markets primarily across North America and Europe. It specializes in producing tight-tolerance, mission-critical parts that adhere to rigorous industry quality requirements.
LSF vs TPCS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $13.3M | $7.1M |
| Net Profit | $-1.8M | $-1.5M |
| Gross Margin | 34.1% | 5.4% |
| Operating Margin | -13.5% | -19.1% |
| Net Margin | -13.2% | -20.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 15.0% | -6.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -341.4% | -84.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.15 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $13.3M | $7.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.9M | $9.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.0M | $7.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.7M | $9.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.6M | $7.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.8M | $8.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.0M | $8.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.9M | $8.6M |
| Q4 25 | $-1.8M | $-1.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-975.1K | $825.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-362.2K | $-597.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-156.2K | $112.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-398.4K | $-799.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-166.1K | $-601.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-239.1K | $-1.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.0M | $-5.1M |
| Q4 25 | 34.1% | 5.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 36.5% | 27.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 39.9% | 14.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 41.9% | 22.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 38.6% | 13.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 43.0% | 11.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 41.8% | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 40.0% | 14.3% |
| Q4 25 | -13.5% | -19.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -7.7% | 10.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.3% | -6.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.9% | 3.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -4.1% | -9.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.3% | -5.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -3.4% | -16.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -11.0% | -28.6% |
| Q4 25 | -13.2% | -20.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -7.6% | 9.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.0% | -8.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.3% | 1.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.4% | -10.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.4% | -6.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.4% | -18.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -10.3% | -59.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.15 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.08 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.06 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.01 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.08 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.06 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.16 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.59 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $5.1M | $50.0K |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $11.5M | $8.0M |
| Total Assets | $19.2M | $32.8M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $5.1M | $50.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.1M | $220.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.9M | $143.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.0M | $195.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.3M | $165.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.9M | $132.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.6M | $44.8K | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.1M | $138.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $19.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $11.5M | $8.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.8M | $9.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.4M | $8.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.3M | $8.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.2M | $8.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.1M | $8.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.6M | $7.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.7M | $7.8M |
| Q4 25 | $19.2M | $32.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.9M | $33.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.4M | $32.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $21.5M | $33.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.3M | $32.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.8M | $35.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.0M | $35.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $17.6M | $34.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $68.4K | $183.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-827.0K |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -11.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 14.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-4.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $68.4K | $183.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2M | $-1.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.8M | $646.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.3M | $396.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $339.2K | $-570.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $305.8K | $-532.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $642.7K | $107.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-422.3K | $-452.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | $-827.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-2.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-604.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-930.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-1.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-2.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-94.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-900.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | -11.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -22.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -8.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -9.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -22.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -21.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -1.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -10.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | 14.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 11.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 16.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 14.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 15.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 15.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 5.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -1.31× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.54× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LSF
| Wholesale | $7.0M | 52% |
| Coffee Tea And Hot Chocolate Products | $4.4M | 33% |
| Hydration And Beverage Enhancing Supplements | $1.6M | 12% |
| Other | $352.6K | 3% |
TPCS
| Defense | $6.7M | 94% |
| Other | $410.0K | 6% |
