vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Laird Superfood, Inc. (LSF) and Velo3D, Inc. (VELO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Laird Superfood, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($13.3M vs $9.4M, roughly 1.4× Velo3D, Inc.). Laird Superfood, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -13.2% vs -231.9%, a 218.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Laird Superfood, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.0% vs -25.2%). Over the past eight quarters, Laird Superfood, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (16.1% CAGR vs -1.8%).
Laird Superfood, Inc. develops, manufactures and sells a portfolio of plant-based functional superfood products, including premium coffee creamers, hydration blends, nutritional supplements, and plant-powered snacks. It serves health-conscious consumers through direct-to-consumer e-commerce platforms and offline retail partners, mainly operating in the North American market with a focus on sustainably sourced clean ingredients.
Velo3D, Inc. develops and sells advanced end-to-end metal additive manufacturing (3D printing) solutions, comprising industrial-grade printers, specialized processing software, and high-performance metal materials. It primarily serves global aerospace, defense, energy, semiconductor and industrial manufacturing markets, enabling customers to produce complex, high-precision metal parts that are difficult to manufacture with traditional methods.
LSF vs VELO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $13.3M | $9.4M |
| Net Profit | $-1.8M | $-21.9M |
| Gross Margin | 34.1% | -73.6% |
| Operating Margin | -13.5% | -231.0% |
| Net Margin | -13.2% | -231.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 15.0% | -25.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -341.4% | -2.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.87 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $13.3M | $9.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.9M | $13.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.0M | $13.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.7M | $9.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.6M | $12.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.8M | $8.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.0M | $10.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.9M | $9.8M |
| Q4 25 | $-1.8M | $-21.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-975.1K | $-11.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-362.2K | $-13.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-156.2K | $-25.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-398.4K | $-21.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-166.1K | $-21.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-239.1K | $935.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.0M | $-27.5M |
| Q4 25 | 34.1% | -73.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 36.5% | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 39.9% | -11.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 41.9% | 7.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 38.6% | -3.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 43.0% | 49.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 41.8% | -28.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 40.0% | -28.8% |
| Q4 25 | -13.5% | -231.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -7.7% | -73.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.3% | -85.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.9% | -123.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -4.1% | -167.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.3% | -213.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -3.4% | -187.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -11.0% | -211.1% |
| Q4 25 | -13.2% | -231.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -7.6% | -82.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.0% | -97.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.3% | -268.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.4% | -168.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.4% | -265.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.4% | 9.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -10.3% | -281.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.87 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.65 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.94 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-1.87 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $7.06 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-35.52 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.65 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-55.51 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $5.1M | $39.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $31.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $11.5M | $38.2M |
| Total Assets | $19.2M | $105.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.81× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $5.1M | $39.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.1M | $11.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.9M | $854.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.0M | $3.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.3M | $1.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.9M | $1.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.6M | $3.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.1M | $10.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $31.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $23.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $22.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $21.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $5.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $32.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $33.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $44.0M |
| Q4 25 | $11.5M | $38.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.8M | $29.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.4M | $21.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.3M | $32.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.2M | $39.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.1M | $34.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.6M | $52.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.7M | $45.5M |
| Q4 25 | $19.2M | $105.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.9M | $93.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.4M | $78.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $21.5M | $91.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.3M | $89.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.8M | $110.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.0M | $116.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $17.6M | $136.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.81× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.77× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.05× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.66× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.14× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.94× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.64× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.97× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $68.4K | $-7.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-8.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -88.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 6.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $68.4K | $-7.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2M | $-6.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.8M | $-1.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.3M | $-12.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $339.2K | $-2.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $305.8K | $-2.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $642.7K | $-8.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-422.3K | $-20.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-8.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-6.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-3.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-2.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-2.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-8.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-20.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | -88.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -46.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -22.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -17.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -24.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -77.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -209.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 6.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 13.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -8.52× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LSF
| Wholesale | $7.0M | 52% |
| Coffee Tea And Hot Chocolate Products | $4.4M | 33% |
| Hydration And Beverage Enhancing Supplements | $1.6M | 12% |
| Other | $352.6K | 3% |
VELO
Segment breakdown not available.
