vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of LANDSTAR SYSTEM INC (LSTR) and OGE ENERGY CORP. (OGE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
LANDSTAR SYSTEM INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.2B vs $752.6M, roughly 1.6× OGE ENERGY CORP.). OGE ENERGY CORP. runs the higher net margin — 6.7% vs 3.4%, a 3.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, LANDSTAR SYSTEM INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (1.6% vs 0.7%). Over the past eight quarters, OGE ENERGY CORP.'s revenue compounded faster (8.1% CAGR vs -2.2%).
Landstar System, Inc. is an American transportation services company specializing in logistics and, more specifically, third-party logistics. Landstar utilizes an extensive network of over 8,800 independent owner-operators, referred to internally as business capacity owners (BCOs), over 1,000 independent freight agents, and over 70,000 vetted carriers. Landstar provides services principally throughout the United States and to a lesser extent in Canada and between the U.S. and Canada, Mexico, ...
Oklahoma Gas & Electric Company is a regulated electric utility company that serves over 843,000 customers in Oklahoma and Arkansas, including 1.5 million people in the Oklahoma City Metropolitan Area. It is the leading subsidiary of OGE Energy Corp., with headquarters in downtown Oklahoma City. OGE Energy is also the former parent of Enogex Inc., a natural gas pipeline business which merged with CenterPoint Energy's midstream business to form Enable Midstream in 2013, in 2021 OGE and CenterP...
LSTR vs OGE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.2B | $752.6M |
| Net Profit | $39.4M | $50.2M |
| Gross Margin | 9.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | 4.5% | 15.0% |
| Net Margin | 3.4% | 6.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 1.6% | 0.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 32.3% | -19.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.16 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.2B | $752.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $701.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $719.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $741.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $744.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $945.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $644.1M |
| Q1 26 | $39.4M | $50.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $23.9M | $69.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.4M | $231.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $41.9M | $107.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $29.8M | $62.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $46.2M | $101.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $50.0M | $218.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $52.6M | $102.3M |
| Q1 26 | 9.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 59.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 62.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 63.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 56.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 59.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 63.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 69.9% |
| Q1 26 | 4.5% | 15.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.5% | 19.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.2% | 33.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.6% | 25.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.4% | 18.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.8% | 24.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.2% | 33.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.6% | 27.3% |
| Q1 26 | 3.4% | 6.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.0% | 9.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.6% | 22.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.5% | 14.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.6% | 8.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.8% | 13.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.1% | 23.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.3% | 15.9% |
| Q1 26 | $1.16 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.70 | $0.34 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.56 | $1.14 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.20 | $0.53 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.85 | $0.31 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.30 | $0.50 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.41 | $1.09 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.48 | $0.51 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $411.0M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $26.1M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $799.0M | — |
| Total Assets | $1.6B | — |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.03× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $411.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $452.2M | $200.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $434.4M | $300.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $426.2M | $500.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $473.4M | $26.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $566.6M | $600.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $531.3M | $9.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $504.0M | $100.0K |
| Q1 26 | $26.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0 | $5.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $0 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0 | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $0 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0 | — |
| Q1 26 | $799.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $795.7M | $5.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $888.7M | $4.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $921.8M | $4.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $930.8M | $4.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $972.4M | $4.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.0B | $4.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $4.5B |
| Q1 26 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | $14.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $14.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $14.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $14.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $13.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $13.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $13.2B |
| Q1 26 | 0.03× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.00× | 1.08× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.00× | 1.09× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.00× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LSTR
Segment breakdown not available.
OGE
| Residential | $260.4M | 35% |
| Commercial | $212.0M | 28% |
| Public authorities and street light | $61.9M | 8% |
| Industrial | $60.7M | 8% |
| Oilfield | $58.4M | 8% |
| Integrated market | $47.3M | 6% |
| Transmission | $40.7M | 5% |
