vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of LANDSTAR SYSTEM INC (LSTR) and Reynolds Consumer Products Inc. (REYN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
LANDSTAR SYSTEM INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.2B vs $1.0B, roughly 1.1× Reynolds Consumer Products Inc.). Reynolds Consumer Products Inc. runs the higher net margin — 11.4% vs 3.4%, a 8.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, LANDSTAR SYSTEM INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (1.6% vs 1.2%). Over the past eight quarters, Reynolds Consumer Products Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (11.4% CAGR vs -2.2%).
Landstar System, Inc. is an American transportation services company specializing in logistics and, more specifically, third-party logistics. Landstar utilizes an extensive network of over 8,800 independent owner-operators, referred to internally as business capacity owners (BCOs), over 1,000 independent freight agents, and over 70,000 vetted carriers. Landstar provides services principally throughout the United States and to a lesser extent in Canada and between the U.S. and Canada, Mexico, ...
The Rival Company is an American manufacturer of small appliances that produces products under the Bionaire, Crock-Pot, Fasco, Patton, Pollenex, Rival, Simer, and White Mountain brands. It became a wholly owned subsidiary of Holmes Products Corp. in 1999, and later became a brand of Sunbeam Products, a subsidiary of Jarden Corporation, which purchased Holmes in 2005. Jarden, in turn, merged with Newell Rubbermaid in 2016. It is now part of the Newell Brands company.
LSTR vs REYN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.2B | $1.0B |
| Net Profit | $39.4M | $118.0M |
| Gross Margin | 9.6% | 25.7% |
| Operating Margin | 4.5% | 14.8% |
| Net Margin | 3.4% | 11.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 1.6% | 1.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 32.3% | -1.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.16 | $0.55 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $931.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $938.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $818.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $910.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $930.0M |
| Q1 26 | $39.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $23.9M | $118.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.4M | $79.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $41.9M | $73.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $29.8M | $31.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $46.2M | $120.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $50.0M | $86.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $52.6M | $97.0M |
| Q1 26 | 9.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 25.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 25.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 24.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 23.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 27.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 26.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 27.5% |
| Q1 26 | 4.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.5% | 14.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.2% | 11.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.6% | 10.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.4% | 5.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.8% | 15.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.2% | 12.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.6% | 12.4% |
| Q1 26 | 3.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.0% | 11.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.6% | 8.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.5% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.6% | 3.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.8% | 11.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.1% | 9.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.3% | 10.4% |
| Q1 26 | $1.16 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.70 | $0.55 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.56 | $0.38 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.20 | $0.35 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.85 | $0.15 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.30 | $0.57 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.41 | $0.41 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.48 | $0.46 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $411.0M | $147.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $26.1M | $1.6B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $799.0M | $2.3B |
| Total Assets | $1.6B | $4.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.03× | 0.70× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $411.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $452.2M | $147.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $434.4M | $53.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $426.2M | $57.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $473.4M | $58.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $566.6M | $137.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $531.3M | $96.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $504.0M | $101.0M |
| Q1 26 | $26.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0 | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $0 | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $0 | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $0 | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $0 | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $0 | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $0 | $1.8B |
| Q1 26 | $799.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $795.7M | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $888.7M | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $921.8M | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $930.8M | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $972.4M | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.0B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $2.0B |
| Q1 26 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | $4.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $4.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $4.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $4.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $4.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $4.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $4.9B |
| Q1 26 | 0.03× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.00× | 0.70× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.00× | 0.75× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.00× | 0.76× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.00× | 0.77× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.00× | 0.79× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.00× | 0.84× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.00× | 0.87× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $237.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $200.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 19.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 3.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 2.01× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $316.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $72.7M | $237.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $89.3M | $93.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.1M | $91.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $55.7M | $56.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $61.1M | $182.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $83.1M | $124.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.1M | $84.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $70.5M | $200.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $86.0M | $48.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.7M | $51.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $53.8M | $17.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $54.4M | $141.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $75.6M | $93.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $40.6M | $65.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.0% | 19.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.1% | 5.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.4% | 5.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.7% | 2.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.5% | 13.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.2% | 10.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.3% | 7.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.2% | 3.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.3% | 4.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.2% | 4.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.2% | 4.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.6% | 4.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.6% | 3.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.6% | 2.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.04× | 2.01× | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.61× | 1.18× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.17× | 1.25× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.87× | 1.81× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.32× | 1.52× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.66× | 1.44× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.91× | 0.87× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LSTR
Segment breakdown not available.
REYN
| Reynolds Cooking And Baking | $397.0M | 38% |
| Hefty Waste And Storage | $247.0M | 24% |
| Tableware Products | $229.0M | 22% |
| Presto Products | $164.0M | 16% |
