vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of LANDSTAR SYSTEM INC (LSTR) and ResMed (RMD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ResMed is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.4B vs $1.2B, roughly 1.2× LANDSTAR SYSTEM INC). ResMed runs the higher net margin — 27.6% vs 3.4%, a 24.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ResMed posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.0% vs 1.6%). Over the past eight quarters, ResMed's revenue compounded faster (7.8% CAGR vs -2.2%).
Landstar System, Inc. is an American transportation services company specializing in logistics and, more specifically, third-party logistics. Landstar utilizes an extensive network of over 8,800 independent owner-operators, referred to internally as business capacity owners (BCOs), over 1,000 independent freight agents, and over 70,000 vetted carriers. Landstar provides services principally throughout the United States and to a lesser extent in Canada and between the U.S. and Canada, Mexico, ...
ResMed Inc. is a medical equipment company based in San Diego, California, and founded in Australia. It primarily provides cloud-connectable medical devices for the treatment of sleep apnea, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and other respiratory conditions. Resmed produced hundreds of thousands of ventilators and bilevel devices to help treat the respiratory symptoms of patients with COVID-19.
LSTR vs RMD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.2B | $1.4B |
| Net Profit | $39.4M | $392.6M |
| Gross Margin | 9.6% | 61.8% |
| Operating Margin | 4.5% | 34.6% |
| Net Margin | 3.4% | 27.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 1.6% | 11.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 32.3% | 13.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.16 | $2.68 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q2 26 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 26 | $1.2B | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $1.2B |
| Q2 26 | — | $392.6M | ||
| Q1 26 | $39.4M | $398.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $23.9M | $392.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.4M | $348.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $41.9M | $379.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $29.8M | $365.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $46.2M | $344.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $50.0M | $311.4M |
| Q2 26 | — | 61.8% | ||
| Q1 26 | 9.6% | 62.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 61.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 61.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 60.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 59.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 58.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 58.6% |
| Q2 26 | — | 34.6% | ||
| Q1 26 | 4.5% | 34.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.5% | 34.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.2% | 33.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.6% | 33.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.4% | 33.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.8% | 32.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.2% | 31.6% |
| Q2 26 | — | 27.6% | ||
| Q1 26 | 3.4% | 27.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.0% | 27.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.6% | 26.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.5% | 28.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.6% | 28.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.8% | 26.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.1% | 25.4% |
| Q2 26 | — | $2.68 | ||
| Q1 26 | $1.16 | $2.74 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.70 | $2.68 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.56 | $2.37 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.20 | $2.58 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.85 | $2.48 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.30 | $2.34 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.41 | $2.11 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $411.0M | $1.4B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $26.1M | $663.8M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $799.0M | $6.3B |
| Total Assets | $1.6B | $8.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.03× | 0.11× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 26 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 26 | $411.0M | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | $452.2M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $434.4M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $426.2M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $473.4M | $932.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $566.6M | $521.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $531.3M | $426.4M |
| Q2 26 | — | $663.8M | ||
| Q1 26 | $26.1M | $664.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $0 | $403.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $0 | $408.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $0 | $658.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $0 | $663.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $0 | $662.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $0 | $667.6M |
| Q2 26 | — | $6.3B | ||
| Q1 26 | $799.0M | $6.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | $795.7M | $6.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $888.7M | $6.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $921.8M | $6.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $930.8M | $5.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $972.4M | $5.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.0B | $5.2B |
| Q2 26 | — | $8.5B | ||
| Q1 26 | $1.6B | $8.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | $8.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $8.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $8.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $7.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $7.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $7.2B |
| Q2 26 | — | 0.11× | ||
| Q1 26 | 0.03× | 0.10× | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.00× | 0.06× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.00× | 0.07× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.00× | 0.11× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.00× | 0.12× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.00× | 0.13× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.00× | 0.13× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.