vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of LANDSTAR SYSTEM INC (LSTR) and ZIONS BANCORPORATION, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION (ZION). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
LANDSTAR SYSTEM INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.2B vs $891.0M, roughly 1.3× ZIONS BANCORPORATION, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION). ZIONS BANCORPORATION, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION runs the higher net margin — 29.5% vs 3.4%, a 26.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ZIONS BANCORPORATION, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (8.7% vs 1.6%). Over the past eight quarters, ZIONS BANCORPORATION, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION's revenue compounded faster (9.6% CAGR vs -2.2%).
Landstar System, Inc. is an American transportation services company specializing in logistics and, more specifically, third-party logistics. Landstar utilizes an extensive network of over 8,800 independent owner-operators, referred to internally as business capacity owners (BCOs), over 1,000 independent freight agents, and over 70,000 vetted carriers. Landstar provides services principally throughout the United States and to a lesser extent in Canada and between the U.S. and Canada, Mexico, ...
Zions Bancorporation is an American national bank headquartered in Salt Lake City, Utah. It operates as a national bank rather than as a bank holding company and does business under the following seven brands: Zions Bank, Amegy Bank of Texas, California Bank and Trust, National Bank of Arizona, Nevada State Bank, Vectra Bank Colorado, and the Commerce Bank of Washington.
LSTR vs ZION — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.2B | $891.0M |
| Net Profit | $39.4M | $263.0M |
| Gross Margin | 9.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | 4.5% | — |
| Net Margin | 3.4% | 29.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 1.6% | 8.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 32.3% | 21.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.16 | $1.77 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $891.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $861.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $838.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $795.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $820.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $792.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $777.0M |
| Q1 26 | $39.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $23.9M | $263.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.4M | $222.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $41.9M | $244.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $29.8M | $170.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $46.2M | $216.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $50.0M | $214.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $52.6M | $201.0M |
| Q1 26 | 9.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | 4.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.6% | — |
| Q1 26 | 3.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.0% | 29.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.6% | 25.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.5% | 29.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.6% | 21.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.8% | 26.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.1% | 27.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.3% | 25.9% |
| Q1 26 | $1.16 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.70 | $1.77 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.56 | $1.48 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.20 | $1.63 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.85 | $1.13 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.30 | $1.34 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.41 | $1.37 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.48 | $1.28 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $411.0M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $26.1M | $1.5B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $799.0M | $7.2B |
| Total Assets | $1.6B | $89.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.03× | 0.21× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $411.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $452.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $434.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $426.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $473.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $566.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $531.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $504.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | $26.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0 | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $0 | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $0 | $970.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $0 | $964.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $0 | $950.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $0 | $548.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $0 | $546.0M |
| Q1 26 | $799.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $795.7M | $7.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $888.7M | $6.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $921.8M | $6.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $930.8M | $6.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $972.4M | $6.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.0B | $6.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $6.0B |
| Q1 26 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | $89.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $88.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $88.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $88.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $88.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $87.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $87.6B |
| Q1 26 | 0.03× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.00× | 0.21× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.00× | 0.21× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.00× | 0.15× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.00× | 0.15× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.00× | 0.16× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.00× | 0.09× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.00× | 0.09× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $1.1B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $952.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 106.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 13.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 4.08× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $1.4B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $72.7M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $89.3M | $438.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.1M | $-62.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $55.7M | $179.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $61.1M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $83.1M | $119.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.1M | $251.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $70.5M | $952.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $86.0M | $413.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.7M | $-93.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $53.8M | $152.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $54.4M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $75.6M | $97.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $40.6M | $234.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.0% | 106.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.1% | 48.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.4% | -11.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.7% | 19.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.5% | 128.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.2% | 12.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.3% | 30.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.2% | 13.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.3% | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.2% | 3.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.2% | 3.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.6% | 11.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.6% | 2.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.6% | 2.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.04× | 4.08× | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.61× | 1.97× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.17× | -0.25× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.87× | 1.05× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.32× | 5.31× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.66× | 0.56× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.91× | 1.25× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
