vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of LANDSTAR SYSTEM INC (LSTR) and Zscaler, Inc. (ZS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
LANDSTAR SYSTEM INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.2B vs $788.1M, roughly 1.5× Zscaler, Inc.). LANDSTAR SYSTEM INC runs the higher net margin — 3.4% vs -1.5%, a 4.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Zscaler, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (25.5% vs 1.6%). Over the past eight quarters, Zscaler, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (22.5% CAGR vs -2.2%).
Landstar System, Inc. is an American transportation services company specializing in logistics and, more specifically, third-party logistics. Landstar utilizes an extensive network of over 8,800 independent owner-operators, referred to internally as business capacity owners (BCOs), over 1,000 independent freight agents, and over 70,000 vetted carriers. Landstar provides services principally throughout the United States and to a lesser extent in Canada and between the U.S. and Canada, Mexico, ...
Zscaler, Inc. is an American cloud security company based in San Jose, California. The company offers cloud-based services to protect enterprise networks and data.
LSTR vs ZS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.2B | $788.1M |
| Net Profit | $39.4M | $-11.6M |
| Gross Margin | 9.6% | 76.6% |
| Operating Margin | 4.5% | -4.6% |
| Net Margin | 3.4% | -1.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 1.6% | 25.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 32.3% | 3.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.16 | $-0.07 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $788.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $719.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $678.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $647.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $628.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $592.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $553.2M |
| Q1 26 | $39.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $23.9M | $-11.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.4M | $-17.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $41.9M | $-4.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $29.8M | $-7.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $46.2M | $-12.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $50.0M | $-14.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $52.6M | $19.1M |
| Q1 26 | 9.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 76.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 76.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 77.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 77.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 77.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 78.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 78.6% |
| Q1 26 | 4.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.5% | -4.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.2% | -4.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.6% | -3.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.4% | -6.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.8% | -4.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.2% | -4.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.6% | -0.5% |
| Q1 26 | 3.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.0% | -1.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.6% | -2.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.5% | -0.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.6% | -1.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.8% | -1.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.1% | -2.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.3% | 3.5% |
| Q1 26 | $1.16 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.70 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.56 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.20 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.85 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.30 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.41 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.48 | $0.12 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $411.0M | $1.3B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $26.1M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $799.0M | $2.0B |
| Total Assets | $1.6B | $6.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.03× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $411.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $452.2M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $434.4M | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $426.2M | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $473.4M | $1.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $566.6M | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $531.3M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $504.0M | $1.3B |
| Q1 26 | $26.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0 | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $0 | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $0 | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $0 | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $0 | $1.1B |
| Q1 26 | $799.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $795.7M | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $888.7M | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $921.8M | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $930.8M | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $972.4M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.0B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $1.1B |
| Q1 26 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | $6.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $6.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $5.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $5.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $4.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $4.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $4.2B |
| Q1 26 | 0.03× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.00× | 0.64× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.00× | 0.71× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.00× | 0.80× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.00× | 0.90× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.00× | 1.04× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $448.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $431.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 54.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 2.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $924.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $72.7M | $448.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $89.3M | $250.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.1M | $211.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $55.7M | $179.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $61.1M | $331.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $83.1M | $203.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.1M | $173.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $70.5M | $431.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $86.0M | $190.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.7M | $138.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $53.8M | $164.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $54.4M | $314.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $75.6M | $154.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $40.6M | $137.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.0% | 54.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.1% | 26.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.4% | 20.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.7% | 25.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.5% | 50.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.2% | 26.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.3% | 24.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.2% | 2.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.3% | 8.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.2% | 10.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.2% | 2.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.6% | 2.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.6% | 8.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.6% | 6.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.04× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.61× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.17× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.87× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.32× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.66× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.91× | 9.07× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
