vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Lulu's Fashion Lounge Holdings, Inc. (LVLU) and Repay Holdings Corp (RPAY). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Repay Holdings Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($78.6M vs $66.1M, roughly 1.2× Lulu's Fashion Lounge Holdings, Inc.). Lulu's Fashion Lounge Holdings, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -48.2% vs -178.3%, a 130.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Repay Holdings Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (0.4% vs -11.8%). Repay Holdings Corp produced more free cash flow last quarter ($23.2M vs $-2.6M). Over the past eight quarters, Repay Holdings Corp's revenue compounded faster (-1.3% CAGR vs -14.7%).
Lulu's Fashion Lounge Holdings, Inc. is a direct-to-consumer women's fashion retailer offering affordable, trendy apparel, footwear, and accessories. It primarily serves Gen Z and millennial consumers across North America, operating mainly via its e-commerce platform, with limited pop-up physical locations to boost customer engagement.
Repay Holdings Corp is a leading payment technology provider delivering integrated end-to-end payment processing solutions for businesses across North America. Its offerings include credit/debit card processing, ACH transfer services, POS system integrations and digital payment tools, serving retail, healthcare, automotive and e-commerce segments to help clients streamline transaction workflows and boost operational efficiency.
LVLU vs RPAY — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2024 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $66.1M | $78.6M |
| Net Profit | $-31.9M | $-140.1M |
| Gross Margin | 37.9% | 74.2% |
| Operating Margin | -52.8% | -182.2% |
| Net Margin | -48.2% | -178.3% |
| Revenue YoY | -11.8% | 0.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -340.9% | -3304.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-13.46 | $-1.68 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $78.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $77.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $75.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $77.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $66.1M | $78.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $80.5M | $79.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $92.0M | $74.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $77.3M | $80.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-140.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-6.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-102.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-7.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-31.9M | $-4.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-6.9M | $3.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-10.8M | $-4.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-5.7M | $-5.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | 74.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 74.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 75.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 75.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 37.9% | 76.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 38.1% | 77.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 45.5% | 78.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 42.3% | 76.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | -182.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -3.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -138.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -4.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -52.8% | -1.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -8.5% | -0.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -4.9% | -4.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -8.0% | -3.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | -178.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -8.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -135.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -10.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -48.2% | -5.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -8.5% | 4.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -11.7% | -5.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -7.4% | -6.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-1.68 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.08 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-1.15 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.09 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-13.46 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.47 | $0.03 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.92 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.15 | $-0.06 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $4.5M | $115.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $280.1M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $13.4M | $484.4M |
| Total Assets | $108.2M | $1.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.58× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $115.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $95.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $162.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $165.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.5M | $189.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.3M | $168.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8M | $147.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.5M | $128.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $280.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $279.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $279.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $497.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $496.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $496.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $435.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $434.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $484.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $616.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $633.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $755.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.4M | $761.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $43.8M | $754.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.7M | $815.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $57.7M | $813.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $108.2M | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $153.5M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $145.3M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $160.6M | $1.5B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.58× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.45× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.44× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.66× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.65× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.66× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.53× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.53× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-2.5M | $23.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-2.6M | $23.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -3.9% | 29.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.0% | 0.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $1.3M | $90.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $23.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $32.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $33.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.5M | $34.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-5.5M | $60.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.7M | $31.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.9M | $24.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $23.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $32.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $33.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.6M | $34.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-5.9M | $59.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4M | $30.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.4M | $24.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | 29.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 41.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 43.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.9% | 43.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -7.3% | 75.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.7% | 40.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.3% | 30.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.0% | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.5% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.4% | 0.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.7% | 0.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 18.52× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LVLU
| Single Reportable Segment | $63.0M | 95% |
| Other | $2.4M | 4% |
| Stored Value Cards | $750.0K | 1% |
RPAY
| Sales Channel Directly To Consumer | $69.4M | 88% |
| Other | $6.8M | 9% |
| Sales Channel Through Intermediary | $2.3M | 3% |
