vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Lulu's Fashion Lounge Holdings, Inc. (LVLU) and Sila Realty Trust, Inc. (SILA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Lulu's Fashion Lounge Holdings, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($66.1M vs $50.1M, roughly 1.3× Sila Realty Trust, Inc.). Sila Realty Trust, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 10.0% vs -48.2%, a 58.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Sila Realty Trust, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (7.6% vs -11.8%). Over the past eight quarters, Sila Realty Trust, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (-0.6% CAGR vs -14.7%).
Lulu's Fashion Lounge Holdings, Inc. is a direct-to-consumer women's fashion retailer offering affordable, trendy apparel, footwear, and accessories. It primarily serves Gen Z and millennial consumers across North America, operating mainly via its e-commerce platform, with limited pop-up physical locations to boost customer engagement.
Sila Realty Trust, Inc. is a U.S.-based real estate investment trust that owns, operates, and acquires high-quality income-generating commercial properties. Its core portfolio covers industrial logistics facilities, office assets and mixed-use properties, serving tenants across logistics, corporate and retail segments to deliver stable long-term returns.
LVLU vs SILA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2024 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $66.1M | $50.1M |
| Net Profit | $-31.9M | $5.0M |
| Gross Margin | 37.9% | 88.9% |
| Operating Margin | -52.8% | — |
| Net Margin | -48.2% | 10.0% |
| Revenue YoY | -11.8% | 7.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -340.9% | -54.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-13.46 | $0.10 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $50.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $49.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $48.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $48.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $66.1M | $46.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $80.5M | $46.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $92.0M | $43.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $77.3M | $50.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $5.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $11.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $8.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $7.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-31.9M | $11.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-6.9M | $11.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-10.8M | $4.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-5.7M | $15.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 88.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 88.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 87.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 86.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 37.9% | 87.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 38.1% | 87.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 45.5% | 86.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 42.3% | 89.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -52.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -8.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -4.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -8.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 10.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 23.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 17.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 16.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -48.2% | 23.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -8.5% | 25.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -11.7% | 10.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -7.4% | 29.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.10 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.21 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.15 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.14 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-13.46 | $0.20 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.47 | $0.21 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.92 | $0.08 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.15 | $0.26 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $4.5M | $32.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $13.4M | $1.3B |
| Total Assets | $108.2M | $2.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $32.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $27.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $24.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $30.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.5M | $39.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.3M | $28.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8M | $87.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.5M | $90.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.4M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $43.8M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.7M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $57.7M | $1.5B |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $108.2M | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $153.5M | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $145.3M | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $160.6M | $2.1B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-2.5M | $119.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-2.6M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -3.9% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.0% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 23.76× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $1.3M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $119.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $30.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $31.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $24.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.5M | $132.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-5.5M | $29.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.7M | $31.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.9M | $36.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-5.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -7.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 23.76× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.59× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.71× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.06× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 11.95× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.43× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 6.84× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.44× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LVLU
| Single Reportable Segment | $63.0M | 95% |
| Other | $2.4M | 4% |
| Stored Value Cards | $750.0K | 1% |
SILA
Segment breakdown not available.
