vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Lamb Weston (LW) and Owens Corning (OC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Owens Corning is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.1B vs $1.6B, roughly 1.4× Lamb Weston). Lamb Weston runs the higher net margin — 3.5% vs -13.9%, a 17.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Lamb Weston posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2.9% vs -24.6%). Owens Corning produced more free cash flow last quarter ($333.0M vs $-36.3M). Over the past eight quarters, Lamb Weston's revenue compounded faster (-1.5% CAGR vs -3.5%).

Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. is an American food processing company that is one of the world's largest producers and processors of frozen french fries, waffle fries, and other frozen potato products. It is headquartered in Eagle, Idaho, a suburb of Boise.

Owens Corning is an American company that develops and produces insulation, roofing, and fiberglass composites and related products. It is the world's largest manufacturer of fiberglass composites. It was formed in 1935 as a partnership between two major American glassworks, Corning Glass Works and Owens-Illinois. The company employs approximately 19,000 people around the world. Owens Corning has been a Fortune 500 company every year since the list was created in 1955. The Pink Panther is the...

LW vs OC — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
OC
OC
1.4× larger
OC
$2.1B
$1.6B
LW
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
LW
LW
+27.5% gap
LW
2.9%
-24.6%
OC
Higher net margin
LW
LW
17.4% more per $
LW
3.5%
-13.9%
OC
More free cash flow
OC
OC
$369.3M more FCF
OC
$333.0M
$-36.3M
LW
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
LW
LW
Annualised
LW
-1.5%
-3.5%
OC

Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
LW
LW
OC
OC
Revenue
$1.6B
$2.1B
Net Profit
$54.0M
$-298.0M
Gross Margin
21.2%
23.2%
Operating Margin
8.1%
-10.5%
Net Margin
3.5%
-13.9%
Revenue YoY
2.9%
-24.6%
Net Profit YoY
-63.0%
-15.5%
EPS (diluted)
$0.39
$-3.47

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
LW
LW
OC
OC
Q1 26
$1.6B
Q4 25
$1.6B
$2.1B
Q3 25
$1.7B
$2.7B
Q2 25
$1.7B
$2.7B
Q1 25
$1.5B
$2.5B
Q4 24
$1.6B
$2.8B
Q3 24
$1.7B
$3.0B
Q2 24
$1.6B
$2.8B
Net Profit
LW
LW
OC
OC
Q1 26
$54.0M
Q4 25
$62.1M
$-298.0M
Q3 25
$64.3M
$-494.0M
Q2 25
$119.9M
$363.0M
Q1 25
$146.0M
$-93.0M
Q4 24
$-36.1M
$-258.0M
Q3 24
$127.4M
$321.0M
Q2 24
$129.6M
$285.0M
Gross Margin
LW
LW
OC
OC
Q1 26
21.2%
Q4 25
20.0%
23.2%
Q3 25
20.6%
28.2%
Q2 25
20.4%
31.2%
Q1 25
27.8%
28.7%
Q4 24
17.4%
28.1%
Q3 24
21.5%
29.8%
Q2 24
24.1%
31.1%
Operating Margin
LW
LW
OC
OC
Q1 26
8.1%
Q4 25
8.6%
-10.5%
Q3 25
9.4%
-12.2%
Q2 25
11.1%
18.4%
Q1 25
16.4%
16.1%
Q4 24
1.2%
-8.5%
Q3 24
12.8%
16.7%
Q2 24
13.2%
16.4%
Net Margin
LW
LW
OC
OC
Q1 26
3.5%
Q4 25
3.8%
-13.9%
Q3 25
3.9%
-18.4%
Q2 25
7.2%
13.2%
Q1 25
9.6%
-3.7%
Q4 24
-2.3%
-9.1%
Q3 24
7.7%
10.5%
Q2 24
8.0%
10.2%
EPS (diluted)
LW
LW
OC
OC
Q1 26
$0.39
Q4 25
$0.44
$-3.47
Q3 25
$0.46
$-5.92
Q2 25
$0.84
$4.25
Q1 25
$1.03
$-1.08
Q4 24
$-0.25
$-2.92
Q3 24
$0.88
$3.65
Q2 24
$0.89
$3.24

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
LW
LW
OC
OC
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$57.5M
$345.0M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$3.6B
$4.7B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$1.8B
$3.9B
Total Assets
$7.4B
$13.0B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
1.99×
1.22×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
LW
LW
OC
OC
Q1 26
$57.5M
Q4 25
$82.7M
$345.0M
Q3 25
$98.6M
$286.0M
Q2 25
$70.7M
$230.0M
Q1 25
$67.5M
$400.0M
Q4 24
$79.0M
$361.0M
Q3 24
$120.8M
$499.0M
Q2 24
$71.4M
$254.0M
Total Debt
LW
LW
OC
OC
Q1 26
$3.6B
Q4 25
$3.6B
$4.7B
Q3 25
$3.7B
$4.7B
Q2 25
$3.7B
$5.1B
Q1 25
$3.7B
$5.0B
Q4 24
$3.7B
$5.1B
Q3 24
$3.4B
$5.0B
Q2 24
$3.4B
$5.0B
Stockholders' Equity
LW
LW
OC
OC
Q1 26
$1.8B
Q4 25
$1.8B
$3.9B
Q3 25
$1.8B
$4.4B
Q2 25
$1.7B
$5.2B
Q1 25
$1.6B
$4.9B
Q4 24
$1.6B
$5.1B
Q3 24
$1.8B
$5.6B
Q2 24
$1.8B
$5.5B
Total Assets
LW
LW
OC
OC
Q1 26
$7.4B
Q4 25
$7.3B
$13.0B
Q3 25
$7.2B
$13.5B
Q2 25
$7.4B
$14.5B
Q1 25
$7.4B
$14.3B
Q4 24
$7.5B
$14.1B
Q3 24
$7.5B
$15.1B
Q2 24
$7.4B
$15.0B
Debt / Equity
LW
LW
OC
OC
Q1 26
1.99×
Q4 25
2.08×
1.22×
Q3 25
2.05×
1.06×
Q2 25
2.12×
0.98×
Q1 25
2.25×
1.03×
Q4 24
2.26×
1.01×
Q3 24
1.87×
0.89×
Q2 24
1.92×
0.92×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
LW
LW
OC
OC
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$65.2M
$590.0M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$-36.3M
$333.0M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
-2.3%
15.5%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
6.5%
12.0%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
1.21×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$569.2M
$962.0M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
LW
LW
OC
OC
Q1 26
$65.2M
Q4 25
$178.4M
$590.0M
Q3 25
$352.0M
$918.0M
Q2 25
$868.3M
$327.0M
Q1 25
$56.0M
$-49.0M
Q4 24
$99.1M
$676.0M
Q3 24
$330.2M
$699.0M
Q2 24
$798.2M
$493.0M
Free Cash Flow
LW
LW
OC
OC
Q1 26
$-36.3M
Q4 25
$101.0M
$333.0M
Q3 25
$274.4M
$752.0M
Q2 25
$230.1M
$129.0M
Q1 25
$-19.8M
$-252.0M
Q4 24
$-49.6M
$479.0M
Q3 24
$4.3M
$558.0M
Q2 24
$-131.3M
$336.0M
FCF Margin
LW
LW
OC
OC
Q1 26
-2.3%
Q4 25
6.2%
15.5%
Q3 25
16.5%
28.0%
Q2 25
13.7%
4.7%
Q1 25
-1.3%
-10.0%
Q4 24
-3.1%
16.9%
Q3 24
0.3%
18.3%
Q2 24
-8.1%
12.0%
Capex Intensity
LW
LW
OC
OC
Q1 26
6.5%
Q4 25
4.8%
12.0%
Q3 25
4.7%
6.2%
Q2 25
38.1%
7.2%
Q1 25
5.0%
8.0%
Q4 24
9.3%
6.9%
Q3 24
19.7%
4.6%
Q2 24
57.7%
5.6%
Cash Conversion
LW
LW
OC
OC
Q1 26
1.21×
Q4 25
2.87×
Q3 25
5.47×
Q2 25
7.24×
0.90×
Q1 25
0.38×
Q4 24
Q3 24
2.59×
2.18×
Q2 24
6.16×
1.73×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

LW
LW

Segments North America$1.0B66%
Segments International$529.8M34%

OC
OC

Insulation$724.0M34%
Residential$625.0M29%
Doors$427.0M20%
Discontinued Operations Disposed Of By Sale$299.0M14%
Commercial And Industrial Sector$101.0M5%

Related Comparisons