vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Lamb Weston (LW) and RANGE RESOURCES CORP (RRC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Lamb Weston is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.6B vs $786.9M, roughly 2.0× RANGE RESOURCES CORP). RANGE RESOURCES CORP runs the higher net margin — 22.8% vs 3.5%, a 19.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, RANGE RESOURCES CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (18.0% vs 2.9%). Over the past eight quarters, RANGE RESOURCES CORP's revenue compounded faster (14.6% CAGR vs -1.5%).
Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. is an American food processing company that is one of the world's largest producers and processors of frozen french fries, waffle fries, and other frozen potato products. It is headquartered in Eagle, Idaho, a suburb of Boise.
Range Resources Corporation is a natural gas exploration and production company, the headquartered is in Fort Worth, Texas. It operates in the Marcellus Formation, where it is the largest land owners.
LW vs RRC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.6B | $786.9M |
| Net Profit | $54.0M | $179.1M |
| Gross Margin | 21.2% | 94.5% |
| Operating Margin | 8.1% | — |
| Net Margin | 3.5% | 22.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 2.9% | 18.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -63.0% | 88.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.39 | $0.75 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | $786.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $655.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $699.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $846.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $667.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | $567.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $513.2M |
| Q1 26 | $54.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $62.1M | $179.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $64.3M | $144.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $119.9M | $237.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $146.0M | $97.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-36.1M | $94.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $127.4M | $50.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $129.6M | $28.7M |
| Q1 26 | 21.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 20.0% | 94.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.6% | 92.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.4% | 95.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 27.8% | 93.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.4% | 93.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.5% | 94.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.1% | 93.4% |
| Q1 26 | 8.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | 3.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.8% | 22.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.9% | 22.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.2% | 34.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.6% | 11.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -2.3% | 14.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.7% | 8.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.0% | 5.6% |
| Q1 26 | $0.39 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.44 | $0.75 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.46 | $0.60 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.84 | $0.99 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.03 | $0.40 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.25 | $0.38 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.88 | $0.21 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.89 | $0.12 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $57.5M | $204.0K |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.6B | $1.2B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.8B | $4.3B |
| Total Assets | $7.4B | $7.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.99× | 0.28× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $57.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $82.7M | $204.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $98.6M | $175.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $70.7M | $134.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $67.5M | $344.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $79.0M | $304.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $120.8M | $277.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $71.4M | $251.1M |
| Q1 26 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.6B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.7B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.7B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.7B | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.4B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4B | $1.7B |
| Q1 26 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | $4.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.8B | $4.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $4.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $3.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $3.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $3.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $3.9B |
| Q1 26 | $7.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.3B | $7.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.2B | $7.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.4B | $7.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.4B | $7.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.5B | $7.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.5B | $7.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.4B | $7.3B |
| Q1 26 | 1.99× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.08× | 0.28× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.05× | 0.29× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.12× | 0.29× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.25× | 0.43× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.26× | 0.43× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.87× | 0.44× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.92× | 0.44× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $65.2M | $257.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-36.3M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -2.3% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 6.5% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.21× | 1.44× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $569.2M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $65.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $178.4M | $257.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $352.0M | $247.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $868.3M | $336.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $56.0M | $330.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $99.1M | $217.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $330.2M | $245.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $798.2M | $148.8M |
| Q1 26 | $-36.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $101.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $274.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $230.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-19.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-49.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-131.3M | — |
| Q1 26 | -2.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -8.1% | — |
| Q1 26 | 6.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 38.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 57.7% | — |
| Q1 26 | 1.21× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.87× | 1.44× | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.47× | 1.72× | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.24× | 1.42× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.38× | 3.40× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.30× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.59× | 4.85× | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.16× | 5.18× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LW
| Segments North America | $1.0B | 66% |
| Segments International | $529.8M | 34% |
RRC
| Natural Gas Natural Gas Liquids And Oil Sales | $745.5M | 95% |
| Brokered Natural Gas And Marketing | $41.3M | 5% |
