vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Lamb Weston (LW) and Victoria's Secret & Co. (VSCO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Lamb Weston is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.6B vs $1.5B, roughly 1.1× Victoria's Secret & Co.). Lamb Weston runs the higher net margin — 3.5% vs -2.5%, a 6.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Victoria's Secret & Co. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.3% vs 2.9%). Lamb Weston produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-36.3M vs $-232.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Lamb Weston's revenue compounded faster (-1.5% CAGR vs -15.9%).

Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. is an American food processing company that is one of the world's largest producers and processors of frozen french fries, waffle fries, and other frozen potato products. It is headquartered in Eagle, Idaho, a suburb of Boise.

Victoria's Secret is an American lingerie, clothing and beauty retailer. Founded in 1977 by Stanford graduate student Roy Raymond and his wife Gaye, the company's five lingerie stores were sold to Les Wexner in 1982. Wexner rapidly expanded into American shopping malls, expanding the company into 350 stores nationally with sales of $1 billion by the early 1990s, when Victoria's Secret became the largest lingerie retailer in the United States.

LW vs VSCO — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
LW
LW
1.1× larger
LW
$1.6B
$1.5B
VSCO
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
VSCO
VSCO
+6.4% gap
VSCO
9.3%
2.9%
LW
Higher net margin
LW
LW
6.0% more per $
LW
3.5%
-2.5%
VSCO
More free cash flow
LW
LW
$195.7M more FCF
LW
$-36.3M
$-232.0M
VSCO
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
LW
LW
Annualised
LW
-1.5%
-15.9%
VSCO

Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2026

Metric
LW
LW
VSCO
VSCO
Revenue
$1.6B
$1.5B
Net Profit
$54.0M
$-37.0M
Gross Margin
21.2%
36.4%
Operating Margin
8.1%
-1.3%
Net Margin
3.5%
-2.5%
Revenue YoY
2.9%
9.3%
Net Profit YoY
-63.0%
33.9%
EPS (diluted)
$0.39
$-0.46

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
LW
LW
VSCO
VSCO
Q1 26
$1.6B
Q4 25
$1.6B
$1.5B
Q3 25
$1.7B
$1.5B
Q2 25
$1.7B
$1.4B
Q1 25
$1.5B
$2.1B
Q4 24
$1.6B
$1.3B
Q3 24
$1.7B
$1.4B
Q2 24
$1.6B
$1.4B
Net Profit
LW
LW
VSCO
VSCO
Q1 26
$54.0M
Q4 25
$62.1M
$-37.0M
Q3 25
$64.3M
$16.0M
Q2 25
$119.9M
$-2.0M
Q1 25
$146.0M
$193.0M
Q4 24
$-36.1M
$-56.0M
Q3 24
$127.4M
$32.0M
Q2 24
$129.6M
$-4.0M
Gross Margin
LW
LW
VSCO
VSCO
Q1 26
21.2%
Q4 25
20.0%
36.4%
Q3 25
20.6%
35.6%
Q2 25
20.4%
35.0%
Q1 25
27.8%
38.6%
Q4 24
17.4%
34.7%
Q3 24
21.5%
35.4%
Q2 24
24.1%
36.9%
Operating Margin
LW
LW
VSCO
VSCO
Q1 26
8.1%
Q4 25
8.6%
-1.3%
Q3 25
9.4%
2.8%
Q2 25
11.1%
1.5%
Q1 25
16.4%
12.8%
Q4 24
1.2%
-3.5%
Q3 24
12.8%
4.4%
Q2 24
13.2%
1.9%
Net Margin
LW
LW
VSCO
VSCO
Q1 26
3.5%
Q4 25
3.8%
-2.5%
Q3 25
3.9%
1.1%
Q2 25
7.2%
-0.1%
Q1 25
9.6%
9.2%
Q4 24
-2.3%
-4.2%
Q3 24
7.7%
2.3%
Q2 24
8.0%
-0.3%
EPS (diluted)
LW
LW
VSCO
VSCO
Q1 26
$0.39
Q4 25
$0.44
$-0.46
Q3 25
$0.46
$0.20
Q2 25
$0.84
$-0.02
Q1 25
$1.03
$2.41
Q4 24
$-0.25
$-0.71
Q3 24
$0.88
$0.40
Q2 24
$0.89
$-0.05

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
LW
LW
VSCO
VSCO
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$57.5M
$249.0M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$3.6B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$1.8B
$653.0M
Total Assets
$7.4B
$5.1B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
1.99×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
LW
LW
VSCO
VSCO
Q1 26
$57.5M
Q4 25
$82.7M
$249.0M
Q3 25
$98.6M
$188.0M
Q2 25
$70.7M
$138.0M
Q1 25
$67.5M
$227.0M
Q4 24
$79.0M
$161.0M
Q3 24
$120.8M
$169.0M
Q2 24
$71.4M
$105.0M
Total Debt
LW
LW
VSCO
VSCO
Q1 26
$3.6B
Q4 25
$3.6B
Q3 25
$3.7B
Q2 25
$3.7B
Q1 25
$3.7B
Q4 24
$3.7B
Q3 24
$3.4B
Q2 24
$3.4B
Stockholders' Equity
LW
LW
VSCO
VSCO
Q1 26
$1.8B
Q4 25
$1.8B
$653.0M
Q3 25
$1.8B
$680.0M
Q2 25
$1.7B
$645.0M
Q1 25
$1.6B
$640.0M
Q4 24
$1.6B
$429.0M
Q3 24
$1.8B
$472.0M
Q2 24
$1.8B
$423.0M
Total Assets
LW
LW
VSCO
VSCO
Q1 26
$7.4B
Q4 25
$7.3B
$5.1B
Q3 25
$7.2B
$4.8B
Q2 25
$7.4B
$4.6B
Q1 25
$7.4B
$4.5B
Q4 24
$7.5B
$4.9B
Q3 24
$7.5B
$4.6B
Q2 24
$7.4B
$4.4B
Debt / Equity
LW
LW
VSCO
VSCO
Q1 26
1.99×
Q4 25
2.08×
Q3 25
2.05×
Q2 25
2.12×
Q1 25
2.25×
Q4 24
2.26×
Q3 24
1.87×
Q2 24
1.92×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
LW
LW
VSCO
VSCO
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$65.2M
$-180.0M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$-36.3M
$-232.0M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
-2.3%
-15.8%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
6.5%
3.5%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
1.21×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$569.2M
$309.0M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
LW
LW
VSCO
VSCO
Q1 26
$65.2M
Q4 25
$178.4M
$-180.0M
Q3 25
$352.0M
$156.0M
Q2 25
$868.3M
$-150.0M
Q1 25
$56.0M
$674.0M
Q4 24
$99.1M
$-248.0M
Q3 24
$330.2M
$115.0M
Q2 24
$798.2M
$-116.0M
Free Cash Flow
LW
LW
VSCO
VSCO
Q1 26
$-36.3M
Q4 25
$101.0M
$-232.0M
Q3 25
$274.4M
$88.0M
Q2 25
$230.1M
$-193.0M
Q1 25
$-19.8M
$646.0M
Q4 24
$-49.6M
$-299.0M
Q3 24
$4.3M
$55.0M
Q2 24
$-131.3M
$-155.0M
FCF Margin
LW
LW
VSCO
VSCO
Q1 26
-2.3%
Q4 25
6.2%
-15.8%
Q3 25
16.5%
6.0%
Q2 25
13.7%
-14.3%
Q1 25
-1.3%
30.7%
Q4 24
-3.1%
-22.2%
Q3 24
0.3%
3.9%
Q2 24
-8.1%
-11.4%
Capex Intensity
LW
LW
VSCO
VSCO
Q1 26
6.5%
Q4 25
4.8%
3.5%
Q3 25
4.7%
4.7%
Q2 25
38.1%
3.2%
Q1 25
5.0%
1.3%
Q4 24
9.3%
3.8%
Q3 24
19.7%
4.2%
Q2 24
57.7%
2.9%
Cash Conversion
LW
LW
VSCO
VSCO
Q1 26
1.21×
Q4 25
2.87×
Q3 25
5.47×
9.75×
Q2 25
7.24×
Q1 25
0.38×
3.49×
Q4 24
Q3 24
2.59×
3.59×
Q2 24
6.16×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

LW
LW

Segments North America$1.0B66%
Segments International$529.8M34%

VSCO
VSCO

Sales Channel North America Stores$778.0M53%
Sales Channel Directly To Consumer$429.0M29%
Sales Channel International$265.0M18%
Sales Channel Loyalty And Private Label Credit Card$19.0M1%

Related Comparisons