vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of LXP Industrial Trust (LXP) and N-able, Inc. (NABL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
N-able, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($130.3M vs $86.7M, roughly 1.5× LXP Industrial Trust). On growth, N-able, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.8% vs -14.0%). Over the past eight quarters, N-able, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (7.0% CAGR vs 0.3%).
LXP Industrial Trust is a publicly traded real estate investment trust (REIT) that owns, operates, and invests in high-quality industrial real estate assets, primarily distribution centers, logistics facilities, and light industrial properties across key markets in the United States. Its tenant base covers e-commerce, third-party logistics, and advanced manufacturing sectors, delivering stable long-term returns for its investors.
Able UK is a British industrial services company specialising in decommissioning of ships and offshore installations.
LXP vs NABL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $86.7M | $130.3M |
| Net Profit | $28.8M | — |
| Gross Margin | 81.5% | 76.2% |
| Operating Margin | 34.6% | 10.2% |
| Net Margin | 33.2% | — |
| Revenue YoY | -14.0% | 11.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.04 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $86.7M | $130.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $86.9M | $131.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $87.7M | $131.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $88.9M | $118.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $100.9M | $116.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $85.6M | $116.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $85.8M | $119.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $86.3M | $113.7M |
| Q4 25 | $28.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $36.3M | $1.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $29.1M | $-4.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $19.0M | $-7.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.3M | $10.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.4M | $9.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-269.0K | $7.5M |
| Q4 25 | 81.5% | 76.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 82.3% | 77.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 81.9% | 78.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 80.7% | 76.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 85.3% | 80.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 82.5% | 82.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 82.0% | 84.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 82.4% | 83.9% |
| Q4 25 | 34.6% | 10.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 50.4% | 8.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 33.7% | 7.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.8% | 1.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 13.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.9% | 20.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.9% | 18.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.0% | 18.0% |
| Q4 25 | 33.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 41.7% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 33.2% | -3.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.4% | -6.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.4% | 9.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.3% | 7.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.3% | 6.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.04 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.12 | $0.01 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.09 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.06 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.01 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.02 | $0.06 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.01 | $0.05 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.01 | $0.04 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $170.4M | $111.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.4B | $393.9M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.0B | $804.7M |
| Total Assets | $3.5B | $1.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.66× | 0.49× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $170.4M | $111.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $229.7M | $101.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $71.0M | $93.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $70.9M | $94.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $101.8M | $85.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $55.0M | $174.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.7M | $157.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $293.8M | $139.2M |
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $393.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $331.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $332.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $332.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $333.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $333.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $334.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $334.5M |
| Q4 25 | $2.0B | $804.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1B | $813.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1B | $809.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1B | $775.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1B | $759.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $765.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | $724.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.2B | $709.1M |
| Q4 25 | $3.5B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.7B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.7B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.8B | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.8B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.9B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.9B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.2B | $1.1B |
| Q4 25 | 0.66× | 0.49× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.72× | 0.41× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.72× | 0.41× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.73× | 0.43× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.75× | 0.44× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.44× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.46× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.47× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $188.7M | $25.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $20.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 16.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 3.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 6.56× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $75.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $188.7M | $25.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $63.5M | $24.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $44.3M | $24.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $39.0M | $19.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $211.2M | $26.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $64.6M | $22.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $38.5M | $27.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $38.9M | $4.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $20.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $17.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $20.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $16.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $18.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $18.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $24.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $746.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | 16.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 13.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 15.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 13.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 16.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 15.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 20.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 5.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 6.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.0% |
| Q4 25 | 6.56× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.75× | 17.36× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.52× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.05× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.18× | 2.04× | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.09× | 2.89× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.56× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LXP
Segment breakdown not available.
NABL
| Transferred Over Time | $121.9M | 94% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $8.4M | 6% |
| Other Revenue | $1.3M | 1% |
