vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of LXP Industrial Trust (LXP) and NACCO INDUSTRIES INC (NC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
LXP Industrial Trust is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($86.7M vs $66.8M, roughly 1.3× NACCO INDUSTRIES INC). LXP Industrial Trust runs the higher net margin — 33.2% vs -5.8%, a 38.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, NACCO INDUSTRIES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-5.2% vs -14.0%). Over the past eight quarters, NACCO INDUSTRIES INC's revenue compounded faster (11.9% CAGR vs 0.3%).
LXP Industrial Trust is a publicly traded real estate investment trust (REIT) that owns, operates, and invests in high-quality industrial real estate assets, primarily distribution centers, logistics facilities, and light industrial properties across key markets in the United States. Its tenant base covers e-commerce, third-party logistics, and advanced manufacturing sectors, delivering stable long-term returns for its investors.
NACCO Industries, Inc. is an American publicly traded holding company, headquartered in Cleveland, Ohio. Through a portfolio of mining and natural resources businesses, the company operates under three business segments: Coal Mining, North American Mining, and Minerals Management. The Coal Mining segment operates surface coal mines under long-term contracts with power generation companies and an activated carbon producer pursuant to a service-based business model. The North American Mining se...
LXP vs NC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $86.7M | $66.8M |
| Net Profit | $28.8M | $-3.8M |
| Gross Margin | 81.5% | 18.0% |
| Operating Margin | 34.6% | 11.3% |
| Net Margin | 33.2% | -5.8% |
| Revenue YoY | -14.0% | -5.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -150.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.53 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $86.7M | $66.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $86.9M | $76.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $87.7M | $68.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $88.9M | $65.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $100.9M | $70.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $85.6M | $61.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $85.8M | $52.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $86.3M | $53.3M |
| Q4 25 | $28.8M | $-3.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $36.3M | $13.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $29.1M | $3.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $19.0M | $4.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $7.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.3M | $15.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.4M | $6.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-269.0K | $4.6M |
| Q4 25 | 81.5% | 18.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 82.3% | 13.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 81.9% | 10.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 80.7% | 14.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 85.3% | 12.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 82.5% | 11.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 82.0% | 13.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 82.4% | 13.2% |
| Q4 25 | 34.6% | 11.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 50.4% | 8.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 33.7% | -0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.8% | 11.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 5.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.9% | 31.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.9% | 14.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.0% | 8.9% |
| Q4 25 | 33.2% | -5.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 41.7% | 17.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 33.2% | 4.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.4% | 7.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 10.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.4% | 25.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.3% | 11.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.3% | 8.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.53 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.12 | $1.78 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.09 | $0.44 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.06 | $0.66 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.99 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.02 | $2.14 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.01 | $0.81 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.01 | $0.61 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $170.4M | $49.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.4B | $100.8M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.0B | $429.2M |
| Total Assets | $3.5B | $661.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.66× | 0.23× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $170.4M | $49.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $229.7M | $52.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $71.0M | $49.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $70.9M | $61.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $101.8M | $72.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $55.0M | $63.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.7M | $62.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $293.8M | $61.8M |
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $100.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $99.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $29.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $28.4M |
| Q4 25 | $2.0B | $429.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1B | $426.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1B | $413.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1B | $409.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1B | $404.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $397.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | $384.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.2B | $381.6M |
| Q4 25 | $3.5B | $661.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.7B | $637.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.7B | $631.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.8B | $634.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.8B | $631.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.9B | $597.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.9B | $560.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.2B | $538.0M |
| Q4 25 | 0.66× | 0.23× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.72× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.72× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.73× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.75× | 0.25× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.08× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.07× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $188.7M | $11.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 6.56× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $188.7M | $11.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $63.5M | $42.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $44.3M | $-7.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $39.0M | $5.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $211.2M | $25.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $64.6M | $2.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $38.5M | $4.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $38.9M | $-9.8M |
| Q4 25 | 6.56× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.75× | 3.19× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.52× | -2.39× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.05× | 1.03× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.33× | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.18× | 0.18× | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.09× | 0.68× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -2.14× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
LXP
Segment breakdown not available.
NC
| Transferred Over Time | $42.7M | 64% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $24.1M | 36% |
